229,659
edits
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It was long-ago decided that we could use the citations of individual episode titles (when available) as a way to make citations more precise, and I don't see why we should get rid of this very nifty feature. I disagree that it "looks bad", and even if it did a little, it's more than outweighed by the usefulness of this policy. | It was long-ago decided that we could use the citations of individual episode titles (when available) as a way to make citations more precise, and I don't see why we should get rid of this very nifty feature. I disagree that it "looks bad", and even if it did a little, it's more than outweighed by the usefulness of this policy. | ||
Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
It's also not a weird [[T:NPOV]]-breaking exception for the Hartnell era. The same policy has been used to e.g. cite individual installmets of ''[[The Time Lord Letters (novel)|The Time Lord Letters]]''. [[The Doctor in Earth history]] would be a massively less useful page if it wasn't allowed to use the "quotations mark trick". | It's also not a weird [[T:NPOV]]-breaking exception for the Hartnell era. The same policy has been used to e.g. cite individual installmets of ''[[The Time Lord Letters (novel)|The Time Lord Letters]]''. [[The Doctor in Earth history]] would be a massively less useful page if it wasn't allowed to use the "quotations mark trick". | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200625144019-44988386/20200625151113-6032121]]</noinclude> |