User talk:Doug86/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Undo revision 100921 by Doctor whos shitty bum hole (talk)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''' | {{Welcome|[[User:Doug86]]|''--[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 11:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)''}} | ||
===Thanks=== | |||
This unit is most appreciative of your assistance in upadted the Big Finish audio links. --Colleyd 17:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Woof. | |||
== Dark Ages == | |||
Thanks for fixing the Dark Ages link and the redirect. -- [[Benutzer:Q1712|'''Q'''<small>1712</small>]] 01:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Novelisation addition== | |||
a | Hi, I removed the novelisation from the classicTV info box, as the novelisation info should really be kept separate from the TV information. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
a | ==Hi Doug86== | ||
I've been a bit absent recently caught up in life and all that but just having a browsw and two things drew my attention one was brief encounters and the other was the BIT comic strips. As both of these are of interest to me and on my list to look at I thought I might make a few suggestions.<br> | |||
a | :Re Brief encounters <br> | ||
I had a discussion some time ago regarding how to list them. I think it was Tangerineduel, started giving them all an individual article, but after discussion we thought about referencing them to a single page. One of the reasons for this is quiet a few had no title assigned to them and would be difficult to find, and the other was the fact that content was concise, but lacking in available depth to warrant a whole page, without reprinting the text anyway. As their were I think just over 30, it seemed to be quite a short series, containable on one page. Anyway don't know if you found the previous discussion, or if these points had been considered, and if so I'd like to know how you're planning on dealing with the unnamed ones. | |||
a | :Re BIT comic strips<br> | ||
On a similar line, but not quite.<br> | |||
I see you've started to give the strips individual pages. Here' a thought! As the strip is so short (running to only four pages, individually titled but often with a running narrative. Could 'we' (and I only say that because its something I've been looking at with regards Tenth Doctor Comic strips recently), combine the comic strip article in the BIT Issue page (yet to come). It would give the Issue page a bit more interest, strip continuity, and as the strip is limited to the magazine with a definite (so far) partwork issue of 52 be more contained. | |||
:Anyway just a few thoughts let me know what you think.[[User:The Librarian|The Librarian]] 15:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
a | |||
::Just to jump into this conversation, after actually reading through some of the Brief Encounters recently (while working my way through various DWMs), they almost can qualify for a page, and with 30 stories would make for a long single page. As for the untitled ones, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 15:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
a | |||
:::I agree about giving Brief Encounters stories single pages, and I think I have a solution for the BIT comics. The Comic Book Database has given unofficial titles for the story arcs. If we borrow from them, it would be like this: | |||
*1-6: [[The Survivors of Platform One]] | |||
*7: [[The Glutonoid Menace]] | |||
*8-11: [[Vaction on Centuria]] | |||
a | *12-15: [[The Living Planet]] | ||
*16: [[Plague Panic]] | |||
*17: [[Exhausting Evil]] | |||
*18-21: [[Wrath of the Warrior]] | |||
a | |||
Just a suggestion, let me know what you think. [[User:Doug86|Doug86]] 20:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
a | |||
==Altering other user's personal pages and postings== | |||
Hi, I've not mentioned it thus far. However please do not alter any further person's personal pages/postings, this is against our [[Tardis:Vandalism and Unhelpful Content Policy#Altering of personal pages and postings|Vandalism and Unhelpful Content Policy]], further actions such as those described may result in action being taken. (But on a side note, you've been doing a great job thus far). Thanks --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:07, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Status== | |||
Hi. Have changed your user rights to sysop (I think), put a message on my talk page if it's not done. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 08:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
It works, thanks! [[User:Doug86|Doug86]] 08:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
a | |||
==Name Confusion Reply== | |||
The Oakley/Oakely spellings are taken straight from the official Big Finish pages. So unless someone has the actual cds, I don't have a way to verify which is the actual spelling, or if they're actually two different people with similiar names. --Colleyd 13:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Woof. | |||
a | |||
a | |||
a | |||
a | |||
a | |||
a | |||
a | |||
a | |||
a | |||
a | |||
Revision as of 12:36, 28 May 2008
Thanks for your recent edits! I'm Jimbo, your robot wiki representative! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is actually a great time to have joined, because we're now fully independent, and working on a host of new features!
We've got a couple of important quirks for a fan written wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
- the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
- our Manual of Style
- our image use policy
- our user page policy
If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! — you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.
Thanks
This unit is most appreciative of your assistance in upadted the Big Finish audio links. --Colleyd 17:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Woof.
Dark Ages
Thanks for fixing the Dark Ages link and the redirect. -- Q1712 01:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Novelisation addition
Hi, I removed the novelisation from the classicTV info box, as the novelisation info should really be kept separate from the TV information. --Tangerineduel 14:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Doug86
I've been a bit absent recently caught up in life and all that but just having a browsw and two things drew my attention one was brief encounters and the other was the BIT comic strips. As both of these are of interest to me and on my list to look at I thought I might make a few suggestions.
- Re Brief encounters
I had a discussion some time ago regarding how to list them. I think it was Tangerineduel, started giving them all an individual article, but after discussion we thought about referencing them to a single page. One of the reasons for this is quiet a few had no title assigned to them and would be difficult to find, and the other was the fact that content was concise, but lacking in available depth to warrant a whole page, without reprinting the text anyway. As their were I think just over 30, it seemed to be quite a short series, containable on one page. Anyway don't know if you found the previous discussion, or if these points had been considered, and if so I'd like to know how you're planning on dealing with the unnamed ones.
- Re BIT comic strips
On a similar line, but not quite.
I see you've started to give the strips individual pages. Here' a thought! As the strip is so short (running to only four pages, individually titled but often with a running narrative. Could 'we' (and I only say that because its something I've been looking at with regards Tenth Doctor Comic strips recently), combine the comic strip article in the BIT Issue page (yet to come). It would give the Issue page a bit more interest, strip continuity, and as the strip is limited to the magazine with a definite (so far) partwork issue of 52 be more contained.
- Anyway just a few thoughts let me know what you think.The Librarian 15:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Just to jump into this conversation, after actually reading through some of the Brief Encounters recently (while working my way through various DWMs), they almost can qualify for a page, and with 30 stories would make for a long single page. As for the untitled ones, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. --Tangerineduel 15:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- I agree about giving Brief Encounters stories single pages, and I think I have a solution for the BIT comics. The Comic Book Database has given unofficial titles for the story arcs. If we borrow from them, it would be like this:
- 1-6: The Survivors of Platform One
- 7: The Glutonoid Menace
- 8-11: Vaction on Centuria
- 12-15: The Living Planet
- 16: Plague Panic
- 17: Exhausting Evil
- 18-21: Wrath of the Warrior
Just a suggestion, let me know what you think. Doug86 20:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Altering other user's personal pages and postings
Hi, I've not mentioned it thus far. However please do not alter any further person's personal pages/postings, this is against our Vandalism and Unhelpful Content Policy, further actions such as those described may result in action being taken. (But on a side note, you've been doing a great job thus far). Thanks --Tangerineduel 13:07, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Status
Hi. Have changed your user rights to sysop (I think), put a message on my talk page if it's not done. --Tangerineduel 08:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
It works, thanks! Doug86 08:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Name Confusion Reply
The Oakley/Oakely spellings are taken straight from the official Big Finish pages. So unless someone has the actual cds, I don't have a way to verify which is the actual spelling, or if they're actually two different people with similiar names. --Colleyd 13:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Woof.