Forum:Did Colin play Davros?: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Reference desk}} | {{Forumheader|Reference desk}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> [[Category:infobox discussions]] | ||
[[Davros]] is credited by [[Colin Baker]], currently under the {{{actor}}} variable in Davros' infobox. I assume that's not a live-action role, "main" ''or'' "other"? Which story did he do that anyway? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 20:14, March 24, 2012 (UTC) | [[Davros]] is credited by [[Colin Baker]], currently under the {{{actor}}} variable in Davros' infobox. I assume that's not a live-action role, "main" ''or'' "other"? Which story did he do that anyway? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 20:14, March 24, 2012 (UTC) | ||
: Never mind, found it. ''[[The Curse of Davros (audio story)|The Curse of Davros]]''. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 21:04, March 24, 2012 (UTC) | : Never mind, found it. ''[[The Curse of Davros (audio story)|The Curse of Davros]]''. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 21:04, March 24, 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, I had a real struggle with allowing that. In the end I got tired of thinking and just pushed "publish". I'm not sure that one-off audio performances are really infobox-worthy. I mean, fine, Caitlin Blackwood has a legitimate claim to Amy Pond — and I think even one-episode actors who are portraying a character at a different time of life do — but this Colin thing is like a body swap. Kinda like the Daniel Anthony-as-Eleven deal in ''Death of the Doctor''. Is that ''really'' important enough to count? I think it's noteworty in the article about [[Daniel Anthony]] or even [[Colin Baker]]. But if it's gonna be in the infobox on [[Davros]], maybe it needs a new variable like {{{minor actor}}} or something like that. | |||
::The fact that you, a fan with a reasonable knowledge of DW trivia, were stumped means that the infobox isn't really working as it is. It's okay for an infobox to provide information that is not immediately apparent — people have different levels of knowledge about the DWU. But this is almost a case of true trivia entering the infobox. Any ideas about how to make it work better, please let me know. | |||
::Moving this over to the Panopticon cause it's really a more generalised line of enquiry. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">21:15: Mon 26 Mar 2012 </span> | |||
Revision as of 21:15, 26 March 2012
Index → Reference desk → Did Colin play Davros?
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Davros is credited by Colin Baker, currently under the {{{actor}}} variable in Davros' infobox. I assume that's not a live-action role, "main" or "other"? Which story did he do that anyway? -- Tybort (talk page) 20:14, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Never mind, found it. The Curse of Davros. -- Tybort (talk page) 21:04, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I had a real struggle with allowing that. In the end I got tired of thinking and just pushed "publish". I'm not sure that one-off audio performances are really infobox-worthy. I mean, fine, Caitlin Blackwood has a legitimate claim to Amy Pond — and I think even one-episode actors who are portraying a character at a different time of life do — but this Colin thing is like a body swap. Kinda like the Daniel Anthony-as-Eleven deal in Death of the Doctor. Is that really important enough to count? I think it's noteworty in the article about Daniel Anthony or even Colin Baker. But if it's gonna be in the infobox on Davros, maybe it needs a new variable like {{{minor actor}}} or something like that.
- The fact that you, a fan with a reasonable knowledge of DW trivia, were stumped means that the infobox isn't really working as it is. It's okay for an infobox to provide information that is not immediately apparent — people have different levels of knowledge about the DWU. But this is almost a case of true trivia entering the infobox. Any ideas about how to make it work better, please let me know.
