Talk:River Song/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Answering the Question about the Blue Book. : ))
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


[[User:Queenling|Queenling]] 19:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[[User:Queenling|Queenling]] 19:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
:She kind of calls it a diary. [[Special:Contributions/71.99.82.202|71.99.82.202]] 14:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:11, 5 June 2008

After reading this entry, I've got a question about it's mention of the Blue Book.

I'd like to refer to this part: "... this might indicate that the blue book is in fact the Doctor's biography, written some time after his death later on in his own personal time-line."

How was it mentioned or indicated that this book was written after the Doctor's death? And since he's a Time Lord ... should this mean his final death or "just" a regeneration?

Yes, it seemed quite obvious that the Blue Book contains some of the Doctor's future and that River Song knows him pretty well. She also mentioned that he looks younger than the version she knows, but it didn't sound to me as if he was dead in her time-line. And since she's so careful about the book, I think she wouldn't dare to mention something like this about his future.

Treelight 18:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

It is only possible that the Blue Book was written after the Doctor's death. If it is likely that River Song has traveled with the Time Lord, it is likely that she may have picked up the book in the further future of the Doctor's time-line.

It is also possible that the Blue Book is indeed the Doctor's biography, it may be added to every time the Doctor regenerates. This would also explain away the theory that the Doctor dies. Although, it has been mentioned previously by a Doctor Who writer that a Time Lord may only have thirteen regenerations.

Queenling 19:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

She kind of calls it a diary. 71.99.82.202 14:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)