Forum:Story Numbering: Difference between revisions
Josiah Rowe (talk | contribs) (sorta, kinda) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::Now, that's "official" enough for my purposes, but we should note that those Region 1 boxes also count ''Trial of a Time Lord'' as 4 stories, which we don't. And I '''think''' (though I'm not certain, and may have miscounted) that the ''Doctor Who Magazine'' numbering by which ''[[Planet of the Dead]]'' was the "Mighty 200" follows what we currently have (i.e. no ''Shada'', and ''ToaTL'' as one story). —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 02:48, July 16, 2012 (UTC) | ::Now, that's "official" enough for my purposes, but we should note that those Region 1 boxes also count ''Trial of a Time Lord'' as 4 stories, which we don't. And I '''think''' (though I'm not certain, and may have miscounted) that the ''Doctor Who Magazine'' numbering by which ''[[Planet of the Dead]]'' was the "Mighty 200" follows what we currently have (i.e. no ''Shada'', and ''ToaTL'' as one story). —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 02:48, July 16, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::I'm not actually saying it's a "production thing" in the sense of being used by the production team. I'm saying it's something from a "production point of view". And in this sense, ''Shada'' ''was'' produced, if not finished. The fact that it retains its production code means, to me, that it should also retain a number in the order. And Region 1 DVDs suggest it's 109. | |||
:::As you point out, though, there is a discrepancy between the Mighty 200 poll and the Region 1 DVD numbering. On this list we at the very least need to acknowledge our sources in the ''lead'' of the article, [[list of Doctor Who television stories]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">16:29: Mon 16 Jul 2012 </span> |
Revision as of 16:29, 16 July 2012
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
I have been making myself a spreadsheet list of the stories; and am noticing a difference from what the wiki here might say to what i can find on the various DVD's.
For example the DVD for the 5 doctors has printed on it story number 130 but the wiki here notes it as 129. So I must ask; is their something I am missing? or has Shada been somehow excluded in the DVD list of stories? Kirokusclone talk to me 07:23, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
- You can check our List of Doctor Who television stories, which has numbering beside each serial.
- From which region is the DVD? And where is the story number listed? --Tangerineduel / talk 13:47, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
Its Region 1 and that's actually the link you sent me. The error arises between Destiny of the Daleks and Black Orchid Kirokusclone talk to me 22:31, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
- In region 1 The Horns of Nimon is listed as 108, and the following story, The Leisure Hive, is 110. This is apparently to leave room for numbering Shada as 109 when/if it comes out on DVD. Shambala108 talk to me 23:36, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
Yea I went and did some looking into the stories; and that is the only answer I could come up with. I suppose that Shada might get some kind of special treatment somewhere down the line.68.43.83.92talk to me 05:15, July 14, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh wow, I never noticed that before. Our numbering scheme is wrong. Shada definitely is 109. Numbering is a production thing, and from a production standpoint, Shada exists. It has a production code which remains honored to this day, so therefore it is a "real" story in the order. That's why our "made next/made prev" navigation honors Shada.
- Our numbering scheme should definitely honor Shada as 109. It's completely wrong that Shada isn't even on our list of Doctor Who television stories.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">21:24: Sun 15 Jul 2012
"Honor"? Boblipton talk to me 21:59, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
- The numbering isn't really production-based, though. Production codes are, and Shada was given the production code 5M. But the numbers found on the Region 1 DVDs just come from BBC Video/2|Entertain/BBC Worldwide/whatever they're called this week.
- Now, that's "official" enough for my purposes, but we should note that those Region 1 boxes also count Trial of a Time Lord as 4 stories, which we don't. And I think (though I'm not certain, and may have miscounted) that the Doctor Who Magazine numbering by which Planet of the Dead was the "Mighty 200" follows what we currently have (i.e. no Shada, and ToaTL as one story). —Josiah Rowe talk to me 02:48, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not actually saying it's a "production thing" in the sense of being used by the production team. I'm saying it's something from a "production point of view". And in this sense, Shada was produced, if not finished. The fact that it retains its production code means, to me, that it should also retain a number in the order. And Region 1 DVDs suggest it's 109.
- Now, that's "official" enough for my purposes, but we should note that those Region 1 boxes also count Trial of a Time Lord as 4 stories, which we don't. And I think (though I'm not certain, and may have miscounted) that the Doctor Who Magazine numbering by which Planet of the Dead was the "Mighty 200" follows what we currently have (i.e. no Shada, and ToaTL as one story). —Josiah Rowe talk to me 02:48, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
- As you point out, though, there is a discrepancy between the Mighty 200 poll and the Region 1 DVD numbering. On this list we at the very least need to acknowledge our sources in the lead of the article, list of Doctor Who television stories.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">16:29: Mon 16 Jul 2012
- As you point out, though, there is a discrepancy between the Mighty 200 poll and the Region 1 DVD numbering. On this list we at the very least need to acknowledge our sources in the lead of the article, list of Doctor Who television stories.