User talk:GuitarMan666

Welcome to the GuitarMan666

Thanks for your edits at Kazran Sardick! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!

We only take the best!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:

• the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
• our Manual of Style
• our image use policy
• our user page policy
• a list of people whose job it is to help you

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:

~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my talk page. -- Revanvolatrelundar (Talk) 14:41, August 15, 2012

Blocking

You say at Talk:The Doctor that you were "blocked". This is a serious allegation as block has a precise meaning here, and can only be done by an admin. As can be seen by examining your personal block log, you've never been blocked.

If you mean that you encountered an edit conflict that temporarily disallowed you from publishing your edits, that's another matter altogether. Edit conflicts happen when two people try to edit the same bit of the same article at the same time, and are a way that the system regulates heavy editing traffic. They happen to everyone — your most recent post at talk:The Doctor created an edit conflict for me — and are not the result of an individual intentionally trying to stop you from editing.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍  <span style="">15:30: Thu 16 Aug 2012 

I meant to say "prevented from editing" though I didn't get the notificaiton that it was an edit conflict. It said "Preview mode changes have not been saved" or something rather similar upon clicking Publish. My first assumption was that I had been locked out of the article personally. So I offer my apologies. I did not realize that there was such a precise meaning for "block" but I figured I wasn't "banned" so "block" seemed an appropriate word. It doesn't seem to have been an edit conflict either as I received a different notification on the thread regarding the new Infobox variable. -- GuitarMan666 ☎ 17:46, August 16, 2012 (UTC)

Being heard in a discussion

I notice you made a suggestion about the infobox picture at talk:The Doctor. Well, I say "notice" but really I didn't. I came across it because I went to your contribution history in order to find your block log.

It's a convention of wiki discussion pages that people post chronologically. Your comment was buried in a part of the discussion that ended a year ago. If you want your suggestions to be heard, you need to put them at the bottom of the current discussion. Putting them in the natural "flow" of the discussion can work in very, very short discussions, but it's generally a better idea to keep your comments strictly chronological, and then use statements like "As mentioned upthread" or "Like <user> was saying earlier" to contextualise.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍  <span style="">15:36: Thu 16 Aug 2012