Howling:Daleks: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:


just wondering, does anyone know who wrote the first comment so i can tell them to check ABC iview (the new episode is already up there)? sorry this is off topic, but they need to know.  [[User:Imamadmad|Imamadmad]] [[User talk:Imamadmad|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:49, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
just wondering, does anyone know who wrote the first comment so i can tell them to check ABC iview (the new episode is already up there)? sorry this is off topic, but they need to know.  [[User:Imamadmad|Imamadmad]] [[User talk:Imamadmad|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:49, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
Imamadmad: It was Kingalien & I've already reminded him several times about signing things. I'm beginning to feel like I'm nagging but it '''does''' matter. Take a look at the "Routine archiving" topic for another example of how he's getting in his own way by not reading things (like reminders to sign). --[[Special:Contributions/2.101.51.170|2.101.51.170]]<sup>[[User talk:2.101.51.170#top|talk to me]]</sup> 00:57, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:57, 2 September 2012

The Howling → Daleks
There be spoilers about un-released stories here.
Run back to the forums if you're scared.

So on the old we all ready discussed wich fraction of the daleks competed in the time war but we still havnt got any thoughts on how the daleks get new mutants ( not trying to be dirty) or wether the new paragrim daleks mutants look the same as the bronze dalek mutants Also any other dalek queries you have I'd love to discuss Also I'm not going to read this until the eighth when doctor who comes to aus where I live so feel free to post spoilers about asylum cause I won't read them till I've watched it

Well, I think that intrusive pop-up that shows up everyone time we try to open a page on The Howling makes it pretty clear that spoilers are allowed. Daleks probably produce either asexually or through cloning like the Sontarans, because I don't really see how sexual reproduction would work in those Dalek cases.Icecreamdif 16:23, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

Believe me dude - you don't want to know. 87.102.83.33talk to me 17:36, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

Spoilers may be allowed but they're not necessary, where Dalek reproduction is concerned. The matter was dealt with in The Power of the Daleks, in 1966. That story showed a Dalek production line -- or, rather, two converging production lines: one for the casings & one for the creatures to go into the casings. The creatures were all "test tube babies", grown in vats. The same was strongly implied in Daleks in Manhattan (remember the glowing green embryos the Doctor eventually identified as having DNA that originated on Skaro) & in Victory of the Daleks (listen to the description of the Progenitor). --2.101.51.170talk to me 21:26, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

P.S. to Icecreamdif: "Intrusive" is far too mild a description. At least it now stays away once you've dismissed it. It didn't, the first time I encountered it. --2.101.51.170talk to me 21:29, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

just wondering, does anyone know who wrote the first comment so i can tell them to check ABC iview (the new episode is already up there)? sorry this is off topic, but they need to know. Imamadmad 00:49, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

Imamadmad: It was Kingalien & I've already reminded him several times about signing things. I'm beginning to feel like I'm nagging but it does matter. Take a look at the "Routine archiving" topic for another example of how he's getting in his own way by not reading things (like reminders to sign). --2.101.51.170talk to me 00:57, September 2, 2012 (UTC)