Howling:Doctor Who: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Gallifrey102 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
One thought: With Moffat in charge, it could be almost '''''anything''''' -- from the obvious (because we'll be sure it can't be) to something totally different from all the possibilities he's dropped hints about in the meantime. --[[Special:Contributions/92.16.2.84|92.16.2.84]]<sup>[[User talk:92.16.2.84#top|talk to me]]</sup> 19:04, September 2, 2012 (UTC) | One thought: With Moffat in charge, it could be almost '''''anything''''' -- from the obvious (because we'll be sure it can't be) to something totally different from all the possibilities he's dropped hints about in the meantime. --[[Special:Contributions/92.16.2.84|92.16.2.84]]<sup>[[User talk:92.16.2.84#top|talk to me]]</sup> 19:04, September 2, 2012 (UTC) | ||
I know Moffat will have done it for a good reason, so I'll always bear this in-mind in future. [[User:Gallifrey102|Gallifrey102]] [[User talk:Gallifrey102|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:29, September 5, 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:29, 5 September 2012
We've all been assuming that "Doctor Who?", the oldest question hidden in plain sight, referred to the Doctor's true name, but Asylum of the Daleks seems to have offered another interpretation. It may be possible that it actually refers to the Daleks or some other enemy who should know him having absolutely no idea who he is. Any thoughts?Icecreamdif ☎ 16:28, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
One thought: With Moffat in charge, it could be almost anything -- from the obvious (because we'll be sure it can't be) to something totally different from all the possibilities he's dropped hints about in the meantime. --92.16.2.84talk to me 19:04, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
I know Moffat will have done it for a good reason, so I'll always bear this in-mind in future. Gallifrey102 ☎ 18:29, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
