Talk:Gridlock (TV story): Difference between revisions
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (→Uncredited cast: new section) |
(→Plot Hole?: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [[Female nudist]] - Uncredited | * [[Female nudist]] - Uncredited | ||
* [[Male nudist]] - Uncredited | * [[Male nudist]] - Uncredited | ||
== Plot Hole? == | |||
I noticed a plot hole last time I watched this episode - In the cold open, Ma yells at Pa for lying to the system about having three passengers in order to access the fast lane when there are just the two of them on board. But when the Doctor suggests to the Businessman (guy in the bowler) that they lie about having three passengers in order to access the fast lane, the Businessman says that the controls would lock if he tried. This is a plot hole, yes? And if so, do we make reference to those on the page? Not under production errors, obviously, but somewhere. [[User:TARDIStraveler|TARDIStraveler]] [[User talk:TARDIStraveler|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:54, September 27, 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:54, 27 September 2013
episode number
I changed the episode reference to "broadcast" episodes - reason being that some count Shada (6 unbroadcast episodes), Resurrection of the Daleks was broadcast as 2 and re-edited to 4, and The Five Doctors was broadcast as one and released as four on video. I assume that the total is based on that. Jack's the man 20:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Uncredited cast
I've moved the uncredited cast to the talk page until they can be properly sourced (not IMDB). Shambala108 ☎ 23:49, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Female nudist - Uncredited
- Male nudist - Uncredited
Plot Hole?
I noticed a plot hole last time I watched this episode - In the cold open, Ma yells at Pa for lying to the system about having three passengers in order to access the fast lane when there are just the two of them on board. But when the Doctor suggests to the Businessman (guy in the bowler) that they lie about having three passengers in order to access the fast lane, the Businessman says that the controls would lock if he tried. This is a plot hole, yes? And if so, do we make reference to those on the page? Not under production errors, obviously, but somewhere. TARDIStraveler ☎ 10:54, September 27, 2013 (UTC)
