Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Blink (edit)
Revision as of 20:41, 5 April 2013
, 5 April 2013no edit summary
m (CzechBot moved page Forum:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Blink to Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Blink without leaving a redirect: Robot: Moved page) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
[[Category:DW TV discontinuity]] | [[Category:DW TV discontinuity]] | ||
::Billy was sent back to 1969 and lived his life through to 2007, aging. Martha was sent back to 1969, but returned to 2007 via the TARDIS when it was sent back to 1969 by Sally and Larry. | ::Billy was sent back to 1969 and lived his life through to 2007, aging. Martha was sent back to 1969, but returned to 2007 via the TARDIS when it was sent back to 1969 by Sally and Larry. | ||
*Since Billy was a policeman when he was sent back to 1969 (lucky he was sent to the same time & place as the Doctor & Martha and not to 1920, hmmm?), neither he, nor the Doctor nor Martha had any resources, no money, no equipment (aside from the screwdriver), no TARDIS. So, how why would the Doctor just happen to be carrying the transcripts with him when the angel zapped him to the past and how did the three of them have the wherewithal to film the conversations that would eventually be put on DVD? I mean, which part of the transcript came first, Sally's or the Doctor's? If it couldn't have been the Doctor because he was reading from the transcripts. But Sally was responding to what she heard and saw the Doctor say, so her part must have come after his. Causality is so often circular in DW with A causing B and B causing A with nothing ever identified as the original action that began the chain of events. | |||