User talk:Imamadmad: Difference between revisions
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
:As for the other matter, I suppose I wasn't forceful enough in my request. I'd rather you just revert the ban, as it's plainly unjust. | :As for the other matter, I suppose I wasn't forceful enough in my request. I'd rather you just revert the ban, as it's plainly unjust. | ||
:The whole thing is a ''huge'' misunderstanding. If you dig a bit deeper into the evidence, what you see is that [[user:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] banned me, [[user:Skittles the | :The whole thing is a ''huge'' misunderstanding. If you dig a bit deeper into the evidence, what you see is that [[user:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] banned me, [[user:Skittles the hog|Skittles]] and [[user:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] at DWA in a fit of pique because [[user talk:BroadcastCorp#You are infinitely banned|he had been perma-banned here for clear, Wikia-verified sock puppetry]]. [[user:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] therefore reverted the ban within a matter of hours, then promptly banned [[user:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]] for abuse of powers. [[user:BroadcastCorp]] was then globally banned by Wikia. Thus there was no actual, reasonable ban of me at DWA. [http://drwho.answers.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User%3ACzechOut As can be seen at my block log] the original block lasted for a little over four hours. It didn't, as [[user:Master of Spiders|Master of Spiders]] is alleging, "lapse". There's no question of him re-instating the wishes of the previous administration, as it's very clear the previous administration meant for me to be unblocked. | ||
:Moreover, according to the current state of [[w:c:drwho.answers:Doctor Who Answers:Policies]] there are not now any policies in place to cover the kinda "crimes" of which [[user:Master of Spiders]] is accusing me. As you're aware, you guys are in a state of upheaval over there, and are only just now writing policy. Thus to block someone who hasn't even contributed to your wiki at all since 2011 for something that happened long ago, when there aren't even ''current'' policies to cover the ''alleged'' behavior, is clearly wrong. | :Moreover, according to the current state of [[w:c:drwho.answers:Doctor Who Answers:Policies]] there are not now any policies in place to cover the kinda "crimes" of which [[user:Master of Spiders]] is accusing me. As you're aware, you guys are in a state of upheaval over there, and are only just now writing policy. Thus to block someone who hasn't even contributed to your wiki at all since 2011 for something that happened long ago, when there aren't even ''current'' policies to cover the ''alleged'' behavior, is clearly wrong. | ||
Revision as of 21:46, 20 December 2012
Imamadmad!We hope you'll enjoy being a part of our community! If you're new to either us or wiki editing in general, you might want to check out some of these links:
- Internal pages
- External Wikipedia pages
Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my user talk page.
Your input is needed!
You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:A second look at wiki achivements.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 17:21:43 Mon 22 Aug 2011
hello! :)
A "New Who" fan then, eh? I guess I qualify as one of those.. although I absolutely DESPISE those squishy, big-bummed Teletubbies they try to pass off as Daleks. I hate 'em with a passion. Sorry, WHERE was I going with this?
Anyway, nice to talk with you. Feel free to contact me for anything.
Your input is needed!
You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 17:16: Tue 20 Dec 2011
Community tab =
Well it wasn't exactly intentional, but I suppose I did decide to exclude the Howling from the nav menus in wikia. (It's still in the monobook nav.) We're at the limit of the things that can be added to that particular drop-down, so a few things have actually been squeezed out. The Howling was deemed of a lower priority. After all, the Howling isn't even in the same namespace as the genuine forums, it allows spoilers and its excluded from searches. It's very much meant as a place you have to work to find anyway, so that you won't be spoiled by its contents. The fact that it was effectively pushed off the navbar therefore seemed appropriate rather than problematic.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 12:55: Sun 13 May 2012
Thank you so much for helping me the asylum of the daleks was awesome and as a big fan of the daleks I really needed to watch that rather then wait a week thank u so much --Kingalien ☎ 07:15, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
Siggys
If you click through on the link and look at the last part of the "when required" section, you'll see that signatures are required on "all odd numbered namespaces as well as 110, 112, 500 and 502". Howling is 112, as noted at the chart on the namespace page. And, indeed, Howling:The Howling reminds users to sign their posts.
The Howling is somewhat irrelevant to the post I just made, since it's not really a forum. Fortunately, the change of the code at the real forums makes it instantly clear that the Howling is a totally distinct area.
I suppose you could argue that this point needs to be made clearer, since you were confused about it. Ordinarily, I"d agree.
However, it's important to note the honest truth: we only have three custom namespaces available to us. This forum software switch is going to force us to create a brand new custom namespace, which would only leave us with one more. If we need one after that, guess which namespace will be deleted without even the slightest blink of an eye? Therefore, I'm not crazy about specifying the Howling in too many pages, because this might obligate the staff to have to do an extensive cleanup, should the Howling be deleted. For simplicity, whatever rules there are for the Howling are best left explicit at Howling:The Howling and Tardis:Spoiler policy.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 04:02: Mon 03 Dec 2012
Banned from chat?
I've just noticed you appear to be falsely banned from chat. We had another user who experienced this same bug, so I've just filed a report with Wikia to have that fixed up for you. It has to do with an errant flag that's set on your account which local admin can't change. Sorry for the inconvenience; I wished I'd known earlier.
Also, I appear to be banned at Doctor Who Answers. Congratulations on your recent promotion there, but I was wondering if you knew that I'd been banned and could explain it, since I've not edited there in over two years.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 15:00: Thu 20 Dec 2012
- Heh, no, it is actually a bug. I mean you were very temporarily banned by Skittles the hog, but then came a software update to the chat feature, and you were stuck with the old flag. When I installed custom javascript over here to change the nature of the user group tags seen to the right of people's names, that js picked up on the old flag and is therefore showing you to be banned from chat. I'm not entirely sure whether you're actually banned from chat or whether it's just cosmetic. I wanna say that it's just cosmetic, because I seem to recall the other user affected by this issue being completely befuddled by being able to enter chat even though it said he was banned. Even though you don't use the feature, you could try entering chat to see if it works.
- As for the other matter, I suppose I wasn't forceful enough in my request. I'd rather you just revert the ban, as it's plainly unjust.
- The whole thing is a huge misunderstanding. If you dig a bit deeper into the evidence, what you see is that BroadcastCorp banned me, Skittles and Mini-mitch at DWA in a fit of pique because he had been perma-banned here for clear, Wikia-verified sock puppetry. The Thirteenth Doctor therefore reverted the ban within a matter of hours, then promptly banned BroadcastCorp for abuse of powers. user:BroadcastCorp was then globally banned by Wikia. Thus there was no actual, reasonable ban of me at DWA. As can be seen at my block log the original block lasted for a little over four hours. It didn't, as Master of Spiders is alleging, "lapse". There's no question of him re-instating the wishes of the previous administration, as it's very clear the previous administration meant for me to be unblocked.
- Moreover, according to the current state of w:c:drwho.answers:Doctor Who Answers:Policies there are not now any policies in place to cover the kinda "crimes" of which user:Master of Spiders is accusing me. As you're aware, you guys are in a state of upheaval over there, and are only just now writing policy. Thus to block someone who hasn't even contributed to your wiki at all since 2011 for something that happened long ago, when there aren't even current policies to cover the alleged behavior, is clearly wrong.
- If you really need proof that a user who's been on Wikia since it started, and who's been on Wikipedia since basically it started, did nothing wrong, then I urge you to look at this list of my contributions and hit every single occurrence of the word "diff". That will show you exactly what I've contributed to your wiki. (Well, exactly since 2010. In fact I've been there much longer, but records prior to the time that they re-did the way Answers wikis worked don't appear in current logs.) I challenge you to see one thing there that's seriously inappropriate.
- I notice that you personally are in a state of indecision over what to do about 41.whatever. If you're unwilling to ban him, given his actual, current, ongoing abusive behavior at your wiki, there must be no question that I, who haven't said a word on your wiki in about two years, should be banned.
