Howling:The Doctors Name

The Howling → The Doctors Name

There be spoilers about un-released stories here.
Run back to the forums if you're scared.

Just something that i thought was interesting in 'journey to the centre of the tardis' when Clara read the History of Time War and learned what we assume was the doctors name.....assuming that it was (based on the doctor and claras conversation later) i am thinking that his name is something that is familar to Clara or the name his name is that of an important figure that clara is aware of because when she reads it she says 'So that's who'..to me this inferes that what she read is famillar to get a 'so thats who you are' reaction

i know moffat said his name has not appeared but he does know the name (? rule 1: moffat lies?) but if the book simple stated what he was called her reaction would have been 'so thats what your called' or 'so thats your name'

this may be wild speculation and me try too hard to find clues but this thread can at least serve as a forum for ideas regarding his true name and why it is such a terrible secret 87.83.10.218^{talk to me} 09:59, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

• Or the book could have just had one of those large plaques on the inside that says "The Book Belongs to". :) – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anoted (talk • contribs) .

When Clara first met the doctor she asked the same thing everyone does, "Doctor Who?" So when she said, "So that's who," I assumed she meant something like, "oh it's doctor ..." ie, she was answering her own question. Just my own thoughts... Whosethebestwho ☎ 12:32, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Yes. Clara didn't seem astonished -- or anything like it. Her reaction was more-or-less "Oh. That's interesting." It was much like someone in (say) Battlefield discovering Ace's real name -- interesting only because previously concealed but not of great significance. However, Clara has very little background knowledge, so far. She doesn't know much about the Time Lords & so on. The Doctor's name might mean much, much more to someone who knew more of the context.

The name, by the way, was in the wrong place to be on 'one of those large plaques on the inside that says "The Book Belongs to"'. It wasn't inside the cover. It was in the text, about halfway through. --89.242.73.246^{talk to me} 12:17, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

yeah i agree it did just appear to be just a passing interest to her like you say because of her lack of knowledge. what im intersted in is the implications theory wise as if i was in clara possition the words i would have used (baring in mind she gets cut off by the timezombie) would be

'so thats what'........(your called)

but she says

'so thats who'........(you are)

to me this implicated that despite her lack of knowledge about the time lords/doctor of/prophecy of trenzalore etc. the word who says that the name if fammiliar to her in some way 87.83.10.218^{talk to me} 09:29, May 2, 2013 (UTC)