Talk:Tombstone: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I don't think so. What's your thinking on why it might be? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:44, June 1, 2013 (UTC) | :I don't think so. What's your thinking on why it might be? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:44, June 1, 2013 (UTC) | ||
::Well, the tricky bit there is that the article, even in its current infancy, mentions a tombstone that's not even ''on'' the real world, and the others aren't real world tombs. I don't think we could put it in a FTRW category at all. We probably need to create something like "Religious iconography" or some such. Plenty of ''that'' in the DWU, which we haven't even begun to categorise. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 15:12: Mon 03 Jun 2013</span> | |||
Latest revision as of 15:12, 3 June 2013
Category[[edit source]]
Would category:monuments from the real world be pushing it? --SOTO ☎ 14:00, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think so. What's your thinking on why it might be? --Tangerineduel / talk 15:44, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Well, the tricky bit there is that the article, even in its current infancy, mentions a tombstone that's not even on the real world, and the others aren't real world tombs. I don't think we could put it in a FTRW category at all. We probably need to create something like "Religious iconography" or some such. Plenty of that in the DWU, which we haven't even begun to categorise.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 15:12: Mon 03 Jun 2013
- Well, the tricky bit there is that the article, even in its current infancy, mentions a tombstone that's not even on the real world, and the others aren't real world tombs. I don't think we could put it in a FTRW category at all. We probably need to create something like "Religious iconography" or some such. Plenty of that in the DWU, which we haven't even begun to categorise.
