Talk:The Toymaker: Difference between revisions
(→My Wish: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I wish they'd bring back the celestial toymaker. When I watched the serial, I was surprised by how good it was. He was a great villain, there's so much they could do with the character. | I wish they'd bring back the celestial toymaker. When I watched the serial, I was surprised by how good it was. He was a great villain, there's so much they could do with the character. | ||
Gotta agree with you, but the talk page meant for discussions about how to improve '''this article''', and not for saying your opinion about its subject. Opinions should go to [[The Howling]] :) [[User:Puchplimmirdeyslithin|Puchplimmirdeyslithin]] [[User talk:Puchplimmirdeyslithin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:52, June 2, 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:52, 2 June 2013
Title
Aren't we cheating according to our naming conventions with this page? I would've thought that, like the Doctor, the Monk, the Master, the Rani and the 456, this character is properly the Celestial Toymaker, not just Celestial Toymaker. Course, that would mean changing The Celestial Toymaker to The Celestial Toymaker (TV story). Anyone else think this should be changed? CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 00:13, December 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Isn't he often called just "Toymaker" by the Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Doctors? In the same way the Tenth calls the Master, "Master", so the the 'Celestial' part is inferred to be his title? --Tangerineduel 12:59, December 29, 2010 (UTC)
My Wish
I wish they'd bring back the celestial toymaker. When I watched the serial, I was surprised by how good it was. He was a great villain, there's so much they could do with the character.
Gotta agree with you, but the talk page meant for discussions about how to improve this article, and not for saying your opinion about its subject. Opinions should go to The Howling :) Puchplimmirdeyslithin ☎ 20:52, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
