Template:Doctor Who Wiki/Charity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<div class=sf style=margin-left:50px;margin-right:50px;margin-top:50px;> | <div class=sf style=margin-left:50px;margin-right:50px;margin-top:50px;> | ||
== But remember: even the BBC spoils stuff | <h2 id=sfh style="text-transform:none;letter-spacing:0px;font-weight:bold">But remember: even the BBC spoils stuff </h2> | ||
This is just a friendly reminder. We define ''spoiler'' to be '''''any'' information — be it narrative or behind-the-scenes — which surrounds ''any'' story in ''any'' medium that has [[T:OFF REL|not yet been released]]'''. It doesn't matter if the source is ''The Sun'' or the [[British Broadcasting Corporation]] — it's a violation of [[T:SPOIL|our policies]] to write about un-released stories, or the casting and crewing of those adventures. | This is just a friendly reminder. We define ''spoiler'' to be '''''any'' information — be it narrative or behind-the-scenes — which surrounds ''any'' story in ''any'' medium that has [[T:OFF REL|not yet been released]]'''. It doesn't matter if the source is ''The Sun'' or the [[British Broadcasting Corporation]] — it's a violation of [[T:SPOIL|our policies]] to write about un-released stories, or the casting and crewing of those adventures. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Times, they are a-changin' | <h2 id=sfh style="text-transform:none;letter-spacing:0px;font-weight:bold">Times, they are a-changin'</h2> | ||
Over the next month or so, the front page will undergo a face lift which we hope will make our content super easy to find! And we'll be finishing up all those little formatting issues that are lingering after our 1Q 2013 overhaul to make the site more accessible to those with visual acuity issues. By June, all those colour issues that are currently driving you crazy — like illegible headers on some tables — will be cleared up. If you do see things that need addressing, please '''help us out''' by noting them at [[Thread:131563|the bulletin board of colour problems that need fixing]]. | Over the next month or so, the front page will undergo a face lift which we hope will make our content super easy to find! And we'll be finishing up all those little formatting issues that are lingering after our 1Q 2013 overhaul to make the site more accessible to those with visual acuity issues. By June, all those colour issues that are currently driving you crazy — like illegible headers on some tables — will be cleared up. If you do see things that need addressing, please '''help us out''' by noting them at [[Thread:131563|the bulletin board of colour problems that need fixing]]. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
So now that we've settled ''that'' pretty conclusively, let's try something new: | So now that we've settled ''that'' pretty conclusively, let's try something new: | ||
</div> | |||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
[[Category:Main page templates]]{{protect}}</noinclude> | [[Category:Main page templates]]{{protect}}</noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 14:45, 9 June 2013
But remember: even the BBC spoils stuff
This is just a friendly reminder. We define spoiler to be any information — be it narrative or behind-the-scenes — which surrounds any story in any medium that has not yet been released. It doesn't matter if the source is The Sun or the British Broadcasting Corporation — it's a violation of our policies to write about un-released stories, or the casting and crewing of those adventures.
Remember, we're not a news site. We're an encyclopaedia. Our focus is on what has already happened in the DWU, not what is to come.
Times, they are a-changin'
Over the next month or so, the front page will undergo a face lift which we hope will make our content super easy to find! And we'll be finishing up all those little formatting issues that are lingering after our 1Q 2013 overhaul to make the site more accessible to those with visual acuity issues. By June, all those colour issues that are currently driving you crazy — like illegible headers on some tables — will be cleared up. If you do see things that need addressing, please help us out by noting them at the bulletin board of colour problems that need fixing.
We also invite you to stop by the Panopticon right now to participate in a number of important discussions that will change the wiki.
While the front page is under construction, though, we thought we'd resurrect a bit of interactivity and give you a chance to give some fun feedback. We've already tried one poll since the finalé, and — wow! — what an overwhelming response! 3865 people voted. Of them, a whopping 2321 thought that the question, "Who is Clara Oswald?" had the best answer. The River Song mystery came in second with 1409, but Lucie Miller and Majenta Pryce had only about 150 votes between them.
So now that we've settled that pretty conclusively, let's try something new:
