User talk:220.233.100.106: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(New page: ==Discontinuity== I hate to tell you this, but Doctor Who IS a television show, and is not supposed to be 100% accurate, nor supposed to be watched with the intention of finding errors, wh...) |
(recent article additions) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Discontinuity== | ==Discontinuity== | ||
I hate to tell you this, but Doctor Who IS a television show, and is not supposed to be 100% accurate, nor supposed to be watched with the intention of finding errors, which you are clearly doing. [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 12:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | I hate to tell you this, but Doctor Who IS a television show, and is not supposed to be 100% accurate, nor supposed to be watched with the intention of finding errors, which you are clearly doing. [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 12:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Recent additions== | |||
''"Plot holes, continuity conflicts with other stories, and bloopers which got past the editing process all go here."'' (from [[Tardis:Format for Television Story Entries]]), most of your points are conversational questions and not specifically errors or disconitnuity problems. All additions should be written with an encyclopaedic style in mind. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:51, 8 October 2008
Discontinuity
I hate to tell you this, but Doctor Who IS a television show, and is not supposed to be 100% accurate, nor supposed to be watched with the intention of finding errors, which you are clearly doing. Jack's the man - 12:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Recent additions
"Plot holes, continuity conflicts with other stories, and bloopers which got past the editing process all go here." (from Tardis:Format for Television Story Entries), most of your points are conversational questions and not specifically errors or disconitnuity problems. All additions should be written with an encyclopaedic style in mind. --Tangerineduel 12:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)