The Curator: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
GhastlyKhaos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(more or less a wholesale rewrite. this isn't the doctor, no matter how you slice it. just a bit of a tease. focus on the script, not one's wishes.) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|other voice actor = | |other voice actor = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''The curator '''of the [[National Gallery]] in [[London]] was a mysterious individual who had insight into a particular [[Time Lord]] painting. He spoke with the [[Eleventh Doctor]] and told him that the name of the picture was in fact [[Gallifrey falls no more|''Gallifrey Falls No More'']], and pointed the Doctor in the direction of a search for [[Gallifrey]]. | |||
''' | |||
{{NameSort}} | The man then made some ambiguous references to possibly being the Doctor once, or that the Doctor was just a version of him. ([[TV]]: ''[[The Day of the Doctor (TV story)|The Day of the Doctor]]'') | ||
==Behind the scenes== | |||
{{NameSort}}The line between parody and narrative is very narrow around this character. Obviously the audience are meant to believe that this is, in ''some'' indefinable sense, an iteration of the [[Fourth Doctor]]. Nothing in the narrative, however, makes such an explicit connection. | |||
[[category:individual Time Lords]] | [[category:individual Time Lords]] | ||
[[category:Incarnations of the Doctor]] | [[category:Incarnations of the Doctor]] | ||
Revision as of 00:38, 24 November 2013
The curator of the National Gallery in London was a mysterious individual who had insight into a particular Time Lord painting. He spoke with the Eleventh Doctor and told him that the name of the picture was in fact Gallifrey Falls No More, and pointed the Doctor in the direction of a search for Gallifrey.
The man then made some ambiguous references to possibly being the Doctor once, or that the Doctor was just a version of him. (TV: The Day of the Doctor)
Behind the scenes
The line between parody and narrative is very narrow around this character. Obviously the audience are meant to believe that this is, in some indefinable sense, an iteration of the Fourth Doctor. Nothing in the narrative, however, makes such an explicit connection.
