User talk:Davidtardis: Difference between revisions
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (→Production errors: new section) |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* any discrepancy between the ''Doctor Who'' universe and the real world (see [[T:NO RW]]). | * any discrepancy between the ''Doctor Who'' universe and the real world (see [[T:NO RW]]). | ||
Thanks! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:07, January 24, 2014 (UTC) | Thanks! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:07, January 24, 2014 (UTC) | ||
: This wiki has a pretty distinct difference between production errors and continuity errors. Production choices can '''never''' be production errors, because the production team '''chooses''' to use two TARDIS props or cardboard Daleks or whatever. Errors refers more to goofs, as described in the two articles I suggested for you. | |||
:I do, however, have a coupe of suggestions for you. | |||
:* Some of the things you've added would be more appropriate in the "Story notes" section of the story articles. All television story articles have such a section. You could write something like, "This story used two TARDIS props. The TARDIS for location shooting was blah blah blah, and the TARDIS used for studio recording was blah blah blah." I'm sure you get the idea. In fact, some of the stuff you're thinking of might be in the Story notes section already. | |||
:* In your post on my talk page, you mentioned continuity. We don't post continuity errors and plot holes on story pages; rather we have an entire section of the wiki devoted to such things. With your wealth of televised DW knowledge, you might be interested in taking a look. It's located at [[Theory:Discontinuity index]] (or you can go to the top navigation bar on any page, click Community, then Theories). On these pages you can post discontinuities/plot holes as well as answer others' postings. | |||
:As for your concern that there isn't any consistency in removing/not removing your posts, please keep in mind that there are far fewer editors on the wiki who know the rules than who don't. We are constantly adding new editors that don't know all the rules yet, and the admins and experienced users can't catch everything. The presence of an edit that breaks a rule doesn't mean the rule is invalid, it just means that it hasn't been noticed by someone familiar with the rule. | |||
:Thanks for your attention to this rather long post. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 04:34, January 24, 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:34, 24 January 2014
Thanks for your edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!
We've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
- the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
- our Manual of Style
- our image use policy
- our user page policy
- a list of people whose job it is to help you
If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! — you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my talk page. SmallerOnTheOutside ☎ 09:22, January 20, 2014 (UTC)
Production errors
Hi! Before you add any more production errors to story pages, please take a look at Tardis:Format for television stories#Production errors and Thread:137474. Many of the "errors" you have added are not considered errors by this wiki. Some specific examples of things that are not errors:
- production choices - for example, cardboard Daleks or multiple TARDIS props
- plot/continuity errors
- any discrepancy between the Doctor Who universe and the real world (see T:NO RW).
Thanks! Shambala108 ☎ 02:07, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
- This wiki has a pretty distinct difference between production errors and continuity errors. Production choices can never be production errors, because the production team chooses to use two TARDIS props or cardboard Daleks or whatever. Errors refers more to goofs, as described in the two articles I suggested for you.
- I do, however, have a coupe of suggestions for you.
- Some of the things you've added would be more appropriate in the "Story notes" section of the story articles. All television story articles have such a section. You could write something like, "This story used two TARDIS props. The TARDIS for location shooting was blah blah blah, and the TARDIS used for studio recording was blah blah blah." I'm sure you get the idea. In fact, some of the stuff you're thinking of might be in the Story notes section already.
- In your post on my talk page, you mentioned continuity. We don't post continuity errors and plot holes on story pages; rather we have an entire section of the wiki devoted to such things. With your wealth of televised DW knowledge, you might be interested in taking a look. It's located at Theory:Discontinuity index (or you can go to the top navigation bar on any page, click Community, then Theories). On these pages you can post discontinuities/plot holes as well as answer others' postings.
- As for your concern that there isn't any consistency in removing/not removing your posts, please keep in mind that there are far fewer editors on the wiki who know the rules than who don't. We are constantly adding new editors that don't know all the rules yet, and the admins and experienced users can't catch everything. The presence of an edit that breaks a rule doesn't mean the rule is invalid, it just means that it hasn't been noticed by someone familiar with the rule.
- Thanks for your attention to this rather long post. Shambala108 ☎ 04:34, January 24, 2014 (UTC)