Talk:Bastic bullet: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Anglo-Norman (talk | contribs) (Use at Games Station) |
Anglo-Norman (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Use at the Games Station== | ==Use at the Games Station== | ||
I note that here and in ''Revelation of the Daleks'' article it states that bastic bullets were no longer | I note that here and in the ''Revelation of the Daleks'' article it states that bastic bullets were no longer | ||
effective against the Daleks by the time they were used in ''The Parting of the Ways''. However, my | effective against the Daleks by the time they were used in ''The Parting of the Ways''. However, my | ||
interpretation of the events portrayed was that Jack was lying about the bullets having bastic heads (he is | interpretation of the events portrayed was that Jack was lying about the bullets having bastic heads (he is | ||
even accused of having lied, though precisely what about is left unclear). Do we have a definitive word on this | even accused of having lied, though precisely what about is left unclear). Do we have a definitive word on this | ||
from any official sources? --[[User:Anglo-Norman|Anglo-Norman]] 18:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | from any official sources? --[[User:Anglo-Norman|Anglo-Norman]] 18:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:45, 18 January 2009
Use at the Games Station[[edit]]
I note that here and in the Revelation of the Daleks article it states that bastic bullets were no longer effective against the Daleks by the time they were used in The Parting of the Ways. However, my interpretation of the events portrayed was that Jack was lying about the bullets having bastic heads (he is even accused of having lied, though precisely what about is left unclear). Do we have a definitive word on this from any official sources? --Anglo-Norman 18:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
