User talk:Ebyabe: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (ArchiveTool: Archiving to User_talk:Ebyabe/Archive 1.)
m (ArchiveTool: Archiving to User_talk:Ebyabe/Archive 2.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArchCat}}
{{ArchCat}}
== Starting DWM articles ==
Thanks for starting [[DWM 448]].  However, it's important to start such articles with the ''basic'' details being correct.  Ever since DWM starting putting actual dates, as opposed to months, on the cover of their magazines, that date has ''never'' been the date of publication.  Rather, it's the date of expiry — the time that newsstand owners are supposed to remove that issue and replace it with the next one.
Also, I'm seeing the cover date of 448 as 27 June 2012.  Are you sure you haven't confused the 449 cover date with the 447?
I know that you may currently see a lot of sloppy language in the leads of recent DWM issues, but it's important that we convey this most basic of information correctly.
Please [[Forum:DWM issues: please help (re)write leads|click here]] for more information.
On another point, please do not include an image link, if that image does not yet appear on the site.  While we generally do encourage red links, they are not recommended for images.  If a person clicks on that red link to add it, they will not get credit for having added the picture in the [[Game of Rassilon]].  ''You'' may not care about this game, but a number of our editors do.  We want to make sure that they get full points, especially if they've taken the time to scan the image.
Thanks again for your edits! {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 16:23: Thu 27 Sep 2012</span>
:Also, I suppose the bigger point is to just use the standard format for adding issues.  This format can be found by pulling down to "DWM issue" on the "standard preloads" dropdown under the "edit summary" of the standard (which is to say, '''not Monobook''') editing window.  It's important to use this standard, because it has a lot of time-saving coding already embedded. '''[[Tardis:Preloadable formats|Read more here]]'''.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 16:32: Thu 27 Sep 2012</span>
::Hi! I'm going through the WantedPages, which is why it may seem I'm making articles haphazardly. Thanks for the headsup on DWM. I looked online and that's the date I found for issue 448. Since 447 was put out in May, it seemed right. But if incorrect, please feel free to fix. I've been rather active on Wikipedia, so I'm used to that, doncha know. Regarding images, I wasn't sure, but that policy is rather what it's like on Wikipedia, so that's cool. I probably won't be making more DWM articles soon, though, since there don't seem to be anymore at the top of the WantedPages.
::Anyhoo, thanks for the notes. Do please drop me more lines should I need more noodging. Cheers! --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] [[User talk:Ebyabe#top|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:13, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
== Blogs ==
Noticed that you tried to start a blog.  We don't offer blogs on this wiki. Also, do please remember to use {{tlx|delete|reason you think a page should be deleted}} when you mistakenly create a page.  Using {{tlx|delete}} puts pages in [[:Category:proposed deletions]], thereby making it easier for admin to maintain the wiki. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 17:44: Fri 28 Sep 2012</span>
:OK, thanks. So how does one get the blog badges then? --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] [[User talk:Ebyabe#top|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:51, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
==Infobox adding==
Some articles are short enough that they don't need an infobox. The infboxen are basically for summarising the article, and if it's not particularly long it doesn't need an infobox. I've removed the infobox from [[Betrothal of Sontar‎]] as it's far too short to need an infobox. I've also removed the infobox from [[Constitution III]] as the only additional info it brought to the article was its origin. I've incorporated this info into the article. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:53, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
:Fair enough. Thanks for the note. :) --[[User:Ebyabe|Ebyabe]] [[User talk:Ebyabe#top|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:59, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
== Section stub ==
Hi! I removed the "section stub" that you placed on ''[[Goth Opera (novel)|Goth Opera]]'' and ''[[Evolution (novel)|Evolution]]''. I did it because the placement was messing up the look of the lists on the pages. If you want to put the tags back, I suggest you play around with the placement of the tag, and use the "preview" button to see how it looks before publishing. Thanks! [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 04:09, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
:Shouldn't the stub box not do that? It doesn't on Wikipedia. Perhaps the formatting for it should be changed? I don't think I'll be adding that tag, though. Maybe notes on talk pages as to what can be improved would be better. ----[[User:Ebyabe|<span style="color:purple">'''Ebyabe'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Ebyabe|<span style="color:green"><small>'''(talk)'''</small></span>]] 15:02, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
::It shouldn't but with Wikia's recent update there are still display issues that are cropping up.
::Additionally, anything that says "to be added", such as where you added a section stub to on the novel pages, is itself I think enough of an indicator. Only use it to indicate a section that has some (though little) content, not one that is totally lacking it. If you look across practically all of the novel and audio ranges the plot sections are mostly empty as the decision to add a plot section was made late in development, so you don't need to add a section stub to these. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:49, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
== Be more careful with categories ==
Thanks for all your recent page creations! Be a little more thorough when categorising your pages though. You added several pages to the category "Humans" when really you want to put them in categories that describe both their species and their profession or other association, like "Human soldiers." And, if a profession or association isn't apparent, "Individual humans" is a good place holder. [[User:Memnarc|Memnarc]] [[User talk:Memnarc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:29, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
:You're welcome! I have been trying to do the more specific categories, but I'll look at the category tree to figure out more. "Individual humans"? Didn't even notice that one. Cheers! :) ----[[User:Ebyabe|<span style="color:purple">'''Ebyabe'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Ebyabe|<span style="color:green"><small>'''(talk)'''</small></span>]] 14:59, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
::Just wanted to add that "Individual humans" is a category of last resort. It should really only be used if you can't tie them to ''any'' sort of profession or association. For instance, on the page [[Vacano]], you had it categorised under both "Individual humans" and "Human scientists", when you really only needed "Human scientists". That category lets the user know that he's both human and a scientist, so "Individual humans" is a bit redundant. Just something to keep in mind. [[User:Memnarc|Memnarc]] [[User talk:Memnarc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 08:37, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
:::Missed that. Thanks. :) ----[[User:Ebyabe|<span style="color:purple">'''Ebyabe'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Ebyabe|<span style="color:green"><small>'''(talk)'''</small></span>]] 13:09, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
== Tenses ==
Another thing to keep in mind is that you want to keep everything in the past tense. Everything in the [[DWU]] isn't "happening" it "happened," if you get my meaning. [[User:Memnarc|Memnarc]] [[User talk:Memnarc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 04:12, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
:Yep, I do. I've been doing so, but may occasionally slip, doncha know. Doing my best. :) ----[[User:Ebyabe|<span style="color:purple">'''Ebyabe'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Ebyabe|<span style="color:green"><small>'''(talk)'''</small></span>]] 17:36, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
== Doctor incarnations ==
Per wiki policy, it's preferred that you don't [[pipe switch]] an incarnation of the Doctor's page to "the Doctor", i.e. <nowiki>[[Seventh Doctor|the Doctor]]</nowiki>. Good job on all those page additions, though. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 19:22, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
:I've seen it both ways on various pages, so I wasn't sure. But now that I see [[Tardis:Doctors]], I understand. Actually, it's easier that way, since the piping takes a bit of extra effort. Thanks, and cheerio! :) ----[[User:Ebyabe|<span style="color:purple">'''Ebyabe'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Ebyabe|<span style="color:green"><small>'''(talk)'''</small></span>]] 20:01, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
==Alternate Earth individuals==
You're kinda confusing the category structure of this category, introducing OOU terms into an in-universe category structure. As you can see in the category itself [[:Category:Alternative Earth individuals]] if you want a category specific to a story go with [[:Category:Alternative Earth (Day of the Daleks) individuals]] or something like that. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 03:39, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
:So, for example, [[:Category:Silurian Earth individuals]] should be [[:Category:Blood Heat individuals]]? ----[[User:Ebyabe|<span style="color:purple">'''Ebyabe'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Ebyabe|<span style="color:green"><small>'''(talk)'''</small></span>]] 13:10, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
:No. That's the right way around. The other categories you've created that I've tagged with a rename are the wrong ones (they're all in the [[:Category:Articles that need renaming]] at the moment). 
:The more specific category name the better. I looked at [[:Category:Imperial Moon individuals]] for several moments and couldn't work out what the category was about. With our category format that would suggest that that category contained individuals who are from the moon "Imperial Moon".
:The category for those individuals, what I assume you mean by its inclusion in that category is [[:Category:Alternative timeline (Imperial Moon) individuals]] or [[:Category:Alternative Earth (Imperial Moon) individuals]] – or something like that. If there's nothing more specific about that timeline that's mentioned in the novel, in the case of [[:Category:Silurian Earth]] and [[:Category:Arthur's World individuals]] those terms are used because they're more specific than "Alternative Earth (dab term) individuals". --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:17, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
== greeting ==
heeeyyy xxxx
:hey back ----[[User:Ebyabe|<span style="color:purple">'''Ebyabe'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Ebyabe|<span style="color:green"><small>'''(talk)'''</small></span>]]
==Linking to copyright infringing material==
Hey. It's enough to say it's correct in text / source material. Don't link to copyright infringing material like the link you left in the edit summary. Only link to material that has been uploaded by the copyright holder (like the BBC's YouTube page or the BBC's eBooks or things like that). Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 16:00, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
:Apologies. Since the info conflicted with what's on the Doctor Who Reference Guide, I wanted to offer extra proof. Shan't happen again. ----[[User:Ebyabe|<span style="color:purple">'''Ebyabe'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Ebyabe|<span style="color:green"><small>'''(talk)'''</small></span>]] 16:17, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
::That's understandable. In future, a page number would be more useful, that'd allow people to check without linking to infringing material. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 01:39, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
== PAGENAME ==
When creating pages with disambiguation in their names, such as [[Guido (The Ghosts of N-Space)]], don't type {PAGENAME}. Instead, type the person's actual name, as the words in parentheses are just for differentiation, and not part of the person's name. [[User:Memnarc|Memnarc]] [[User talk:Memnarc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:16, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
{{Christmas greetings}}
==Wanted pages==
==Wanted pages==
Yes, a few wanted pages are getting out of hand with the number of dead links to them. If we can just get them up and running, with a decent amount of information, that's a good thing. People are more inclined to add to an existing page.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 16:55, September 20, 2014 (UTC)
Yes, a few wanted pages are getting out of hand with the number of dead links to them. If we can just get them up and running, with a decent amount of information, that's a good thing. People are more inclined to add to an existing page.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 16:55, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:47, 28 September 2014

Archive.png
Archives: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5

Wanted pages

Yes, a few wanted pages are getting out of hand with the number of dead links to them. If we can just get them up and running, with a decent amount of information, that's a good thing. People are more inclined to add to an existing page.--Skittles the hog - talk 16:55, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Fortitude

I'm a bit confused by the "the" being a part of the ship name in the recent edits you made. Is there a precedent for the capital "The" and it being called The Fortitude rather than "the Fortitude" anywhere? After all, we don't say The Infinite, The Byzantium, The Titanic or The Alaska, so what's the exception here? -- Tybort (talk page) 03:01, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

I was going by the review in the Doctor Who Reference Guide for Frozen Time (audio story). I was trying to differentiate that one from the one in Domain of the Voord (audio story). But perhaps it would be better to do Fortitude (Frozen Time) and Fortitude (Domain of the Voord)? Whatever works better is fine by me. :) ----Ebyabe (talk) 03:10, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

Plagiarism

Do not copy text over from wikipedia, as you did at marriage. Not only is this plagiarism, it also brings non-DWU information onto the wiki. Switching it into the past tense does not make this acceptable.--Skittles the hog - talk 09:33, September 28, 2014 (UTC)