Talk:Nuclear weapon: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Well, you've given the reason why that shouldn't be the case: it's not the proper in-universe perspective. They're not the same, so they deserve their own pages.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 18:00, October 6, 2014 (UTC) | Well, you've given the reason why that shouldn't be the case: it's not the proper in-universe perspective. They're not the same, so they deserve their own pages.--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 18:00, October 6, 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I think it all should be on one page. A [[missile]] is by definition a weapon, and so is a [[bomb]]. Surely a nuclear missile and a nuclear bomb are both nuclear weapons then? --[[User:Ilyootha|Ilyootha]] [[User talk:Ilyootha|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 11:18, October 11, 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:18, 11 October 2014
Nuclear pages
Currently, nuclear missile redirects here. It should have its own page, as should nuclear bomb, with the information from here being used to fill them and this becoming the article for nuclear weaponry. At least, that's my assertion. Is anyone of a different opinion?--Skittles the hog - talk 15:09, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
- It may be not a proper in-universe perspective, but I would have one single page for weapon/missile/bomb, or at least for weapon/bomb. We could use subsections (and redirects to subsections) if we wanted to discern them.--HarveyWallbanger ☎ 17:07, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
Well, you've given the reason why that shouldn't be the case: it's not the proper in-universe perspective. They're not the same, so they deserve their own pages.--Skittles the hog - talk 18:00, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
