User talk:GusF: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→"Et al.": new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Again, thanks for all your edits! :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 04:46: Wed 15 Oct 2014</span> | Again, thanks for all your edits! :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 04:46: Wed 15 Oct 2014</span> | ||
== "Et al." == | |||
Hello, GusF! Can I ask you why you are removing every "et al." or "onwards" from the references, as in ''[[Engines of War (novel)|Engines of War]]''? Not only I've (we've) always used those notes, but I find them very useful to convey when a reference is to a single story (that is, "this is the first mention to this past reference") or a series of stories ("this is just the latest one"). Is there a new guideline? Thank you :) [[User:HarveyWallbanger|HarveyWallbanger]] [[User talk:HarveyWallbanger|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:31, October 15, 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:31, 15 October 2014
Full stops
Hey, Gus :) Thanks as always for all your work around here. Following a review of a recent edit of yours I did just want to draw your attention to T:PERIODS AND QUOTES. It's an obscure little rule, but it's one of those things that we want to try to be consistent about. Please remember that if you're quoting a sentence fragment at the end of a sentence, the punctuation typically appears outside the inverted commas, as in:
- The Doctor said that he was "concerned about the past".
You only put the punctuation within the quotation marks when the quotation is a full sentence (i.e., a subject and verb), and therefore the punctuation applies to the quotation.
There's a nominal split on this notion between American and non-American usage, with some American style guides, like the APA, giving the go ahead to the changes you made in the edit I cited above. However, remember that we side with British English around here, and therefore T:PERIODS AND QUOTES stresses British style.
Again, thanks for all your edits! :)
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 04:46: Wed 15 Oct 2014
"Et al."
Hello, GusF! Can I ask you why you are removing every "et al." or "onwards" from the references, as in Engines of War? Not only I've (we've) always used those notes, but I find them very useful to convey when a reference is to a single story (that is, "this is the first mention to this past reference") or a series of stories ("this is just the latest one"). Is there a new guideline? Thank you :) HarveyWallbanger ☎ 21:31, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
