Howling:Series 9 two-parter or not: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{forumheader|The Howling}}{{cat|contains spoilers}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> According to Wikia C...") Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I wasn't able to find this "official Doctor Who website" myself, and no link was given. I don't want to begin an edit-war with this person. | I wasn't able to find this "official Doctor Who website" myself, and no link was given. I don't want to begin an edit-war with this person. | ||
Any suggestions? | Any suggestions? --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:12, July 11, 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:12, 11 July 2015
According to Wikia Contributor [[1]] we should not list Series 9 episodes 5 and 6 as a two-parter because it is not a two-parter, however it has been told that these episodes are just not a "conventional" two-parter but more of a linked story, and I would say it is appropriate therefore to list them in one box. He also states that episodes 9 and 10 are not a two-parter either, however these two episodes being the only two left, and Justin Molotnikov having been signed for a two-parter, contradicts this.
He said: It states clearly on the official Doctor Who website that 5 and 6 are not a two parter and that 9 and 10 are not a two parter
I wasn't able to find this "official Doctor Who website" myself, and no link was given. I don't want to begin an edit-war with this person.
