Talk:The Time Traveller's Almanac (reference book): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: sourceedit
 
Tag: sourceedit
Line 1: Line 1:
== I decided to start this discussion. ==
== Non-fiction? ==


I don't get what the main page means. The time-traveller's almanac is done in a "docufiction" style, but it is still fiction. It treats the events of the TV series like they're real, and I think it should be counted as canon
I don't get what the main page means. The time-traveller's almanac is done in a "docufiction" style, but it is still fiction. It is not non-fiction, it treats the events of the TV series like they're real, and I think it should be counted as canon.

Revision as of 19:47, 16 December 2015

Non-fiction?

I don't get what the main page means. The time-traveller's almanac is done in a "docufiction" style, but it is still fiction. It is not non-fiction, it treats the events of the TV series like they're real, and I think it should be counted as canon.