Talk:Gareth Jenkins (in-universe): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


:It's worse than you think - there are actually ''two'' pages for the character: this one and [[Gareth Jenkins (Jim'll Fix It)]]. These two should be merged but I'm uncertain how it should be done. [[User:Doug86|Doug86]] 05:01, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
:It's worse than you think - there are actually ''two'' pages for the character: this one and [[Gareth Jenkins (Jim'll Fix It)]]. These two should be merged but I'm uncertain how it should be done. [[User:Doug86|Doug86]] 05:01, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
::I'd say move the other page here. Any real life person who ends up part of a fictional narrative without being very important behind the scenes should follow the lead of articles like [[Richard Dawkins]].--[[User:Nyktimos|Nyktimos]] 05:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:25, 3 May 2009

Non-canonical means real world perspective, doesn't it?

Can't quite understand why this article is in past tense, and seems to concentrate on the character of Gareth Jenkins, rather than the dude himself. A Fix with Sontarans isn't a valid resource according to MOS, is it? IF not, then this article should be wholly rewritten from the real world perspective. CzechOut | 04:41, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

It's worse than you think - there are actually two pages for the character: this one and Gareth Jenkins (Jim'll Fix It). These two should be merged but I'm uncertain how it should be done. Doug86 05:01, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I'd say move the other page here. Any real life person who ends up part of a fictional narrative without being very important behind the scenes should follow the lead of articles like Richard Dawkins.--Nyktimos 05:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)