Johnson (Children of Earth: Day One): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Bigshowbower (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Dedicated [[MI5]] enforcer for the Government who has been assigned the job of dealing with [[Torchwood Three|Torchwood]] at the start of the 456 crisis. Ruthless and efficient, she has little time for social niceties and is determined to see her job done efficiently and successfully. After killing [[Jack Harkness|Captain Jack Harkness]] a number of times, she used a laser cutter to implant a powerful bomb in his abdomen. After she had used Dr [[Rupesh Patanjali]] to lure Harkness to this fate, Johnson ruthlessly shot him in the back. | Dedicated [[MI5]] enforcer for the Government who has been assigned the job of dealing with [[Torchwood Three|Torchwood]] at the start of the 456 crisis. Ruthless and efficient, she has little time for social niceties and is determined to see her job done efficiently and successfully. After killing [[Jack Harkness|Captain Jack Harkness]] a number of times, she used a laser cutter to implant a powerful bomb in his abdomen. After she had used Dr [[Rupesh Patanjali]] to lure Harkness to this fate, Johnson ruthlessly shot him in the | ||
back. | |||
{{Template:Cleanup}} | |||
[[Category:Individuals]] | [[Category:Individuals]] | ||
Revision as of 05:32, 8 July 2009
Dedicated MI5 enforcer for the Government who has been assigned the job of dealing with Torchwood at the start of the 456 crisis. Ruthless and efficient, she has little time for social niceties and is determined to see her job done efficiently and successfully. After killing Captain Jack Harkness a number of times, she used a laser cutter to implant a powerful bomb in his abdomen. After she had used Dr Rupesh Patanjali to lure Harkness to this fate, Johnson ruthlessly shot him in the back.
It's unclear what's wrong with the article, because the editor who placed this tag here didn't enumerate the page's problems.
These problems might be so great that the article's factual accuracy has been compromised. Talk about it here or check the revision history or Manual of Style for more information.
