Talk:Interweb of Fear (home video)/Archive 1

Documentary

I would argue that with the archive footage chosen and the narration at the time the footage was playing it has a valid narrative and therefore should merit inclusion. --Borisashton ☎ 19:37, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

It just features a few clips in the documentary like Thirty Years in the TARDIS, they are just featured. No minisode was featured. 82.3.146.201^{talk to me} 19:42, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

When the narrator says 'We had a problem' (or something similar) archive footage of a man getting murdered by the War Machines plays. This seem like a narrative (albeit a very loose one). --Borisashton ☎ 19:48, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

But it's still part of the documentary, joined together - unlike other minisodes featured in documentaries. 82.3.146.201^{talk to me} 19:51, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

As I said above there is a narrative, which means it's a story. From what I can tell passes the four little rules due to this. --Borisashton ☎ 19:57, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

In a documentary, it doesn't warrant a separate page, it's unwatchable individually. 82.3.146.201^{talk to me} 20:06, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

I've just had time to watch the documentary (with just the bits with the archive footage from The War Machines) and it makes sense on it's own as a brief history of the BBC website with the archive footage linking the narration. --Borisashton ☎ 16:15, February 4, 2017 (UTC)