Rhiannon Davies: Difference between revisions
Leonardo2505 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Unlike her brother, Rhiannon was more open emotionally. It is unknown who is the elder sibling, but at one point she took a mature attitude with him about leaving the family just after their father died thinking he did not care about them anymore. She also seemrf accepting of his relationship with Jack and even comforted him when he told her he was not entirely sure what sort of relationship it was | Unlike her brother, Rhiannon was more open emotionally. It is unknown who is the elder sibling, but at one point she took a mature attitude with him about leaving the family just after their father died thinking he did not care about them anymore. She also seemrf accepting of his relationship with Jack and even comforted him when he told her he was not entirely sure what sort of relationship it was | ||
She | She was not aware that her brother worked for Torchwood instead thinking he was ''just'' a civil servant. | ||
{{cleanup}} | {{cleanup}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:21st century individuals]] | ||
Revision as of 11:57, 14 July 2009
Rhiannon Davies (nee. Jones) was the sister of Torchwood member Ianto Jones. She and her husband, lived on the Cromwell council estate with their two children David and Mica. Both children were amongst those, briefly taken over by the 456,. She had not seen much of Ianto before the 456 event, but they apparently kept in touch.
Unlike her brother, Rhiannon was more open emotionally. It is unknown who is the elder sibling, but at one point she took a mature attitude with him about leaving the family just after their father died thinking he did not care about them anymore. She also seemrf accepting of his relationship with Jack and even comforted him when he told her he was not entirely sure what sort of relationship it was
She was not aware that her brother worked for Torchwood instead thinking he was just a civil servant.
It's unclear what's wrong with the article, because the editor who placed this tag here didn't enumerate the page's problems.
These problems might be so great that the article's factual accuracy has been compromised. Talk about it here or check the revision history or Manual of Style for more information.
