Talk:Jas Hook: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(my 2 cents) Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Yes, hooks certainly exist (in DWU). But should there be a page for them? They are an ordinary object like buttons, hangers, floors, etc. I would say, unless hooks are used in some especially timey-wimey way, there is little reason to make an article about them. I don't think it's a coincidence that no one has created [[Hook]] yet. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:19, May 14, 2017 (UTC) | Yes, hooks certainly exist (in DWU). But should there be a page for them? They are an ordinary object like buttons, hangers, floors, etc. I would say, unless hooks are used in some especially timey-wimey way, there is little reason to make an article about them. I don't think it's a coincidence that no one has created [[Hook]] yet. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:19, May 14, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:Well, according to [[Tardis:Wikify wisely]], "as long as the noun is mentioned in a valid source, an article can be written about it". There's two likely reasons an article about [[hook]]s hasn't been made yet: no one stumbled across it in a valid source, or didn't feel like creating it. The policy even goes on the exemplify there's no such thing as a object being "too mundane": [[Glasses]]. So I see no harm on doing one for hooks, as long as they are used. Specially if we think about hook variants, such as [[fishing hook]]s, etc. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] [[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:26, May 14, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:26, 14 May 2017
Yes, hooks certainly exist (in DWU). But should there be a page for them? They are an ordinary object like buttons, hangers, floors, etc. I would say, unless hooks are used in some especially timey-wimey way, there is little reason to make an article about them. I don't think it's a coincidence that no one has created Hook yet. Amorkuz ☎ 00:19, May 14, 2017 (UTC)
- Well, according to Tardis:Wikify wisely, "as long as the noun is mentioned in a valid source, an article can be written about it". There's two likely reasons an article about hooks hasn't been made yet: no one stumbled across it in a valid source, or didn't feel like creating it. The policy even goes on the exemplify there's no such thing as a object being "too mundane": Glasses. So I see no harm on doing one for hooks, as long as they are used. Specially if we think about hook variants, such as fishing hooks, etc. OncomingStorm12th ☎ 00:26, May 14, 2017 (UTC)
