Talk:Eater of Light: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Eaters of light IS used by Kar, however it seems to me that it was only to refer to "some strange beast in the forest". "Light-eating locust" seems a far better name and an actual naming of said creature. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:11, June 19, 2017 (UTC) | ::Eaters of light IS used by Kar, however it seems to me that it was only to refer to "some strange beast in the forest". "Light-eating locust" seems a far better name and an actual naming of said creature. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:11, June 19, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::Um... why was the page re-named when the majority agreed that it's called a light-eating locust? [[User:StevieGLiverpool|StevieGLiverpool]] [[User talk:StevieGLiverpool|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:42, June 21, 2017 (UTC) | :::Um... why was the page re-named when the majority agreed that it's called a light-eating locust? [[User:StevieGLiverpool|StevieGLiverpool]] [[User talk:StevieGLiverpool|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:42, June 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::P.S the page itself says "The Eaters of Light, described as light-eating locusts", but the image shows they're not being described as light-eating locusts but he thinks that's what they are. Why the re-name? | |||
Revision as of 19:42, 21 June 2017
Name
While referred to as Eaters of Light, the Doctor calls them light-eating locusts. I'm not sure if he coined the term like the Boneless or Dryads however. StevieGLiverpool ☎ 22:16, June 18, 2017 (UTC)
- It seems to me that the Doctor is just specifying what kind of creature they are. Is "Eaters of Light" ever used, or is it only singular - to refer to the escaped beast? CoT ? 22:32, June 18, 2017 (UTC)
- Eaters of light IS used by Kar, however it seems to me that it was only to refer to "some strange beast in the forest". "Light-eating locust" seems a far better name and an actual naming of said creature. --DCLM ☎ 06:11, June 19, 2017 (UTC)
- Um... why was the page re-named when the majority agreed that it's called a light-eating locust? StevieGLiverpool ☎ 09:42, June 21, 2017 (UTC)
- P.S the page itself says "The Eaters of Light, described as light-eating locusts", but the image shows they're not being described as light-eating locusts but he thinks that's what they are. Why the re-name?
- Eaters of light IS used by Kar, however it seems to me that it was only to refer to "some strange beast in the forest". "Light-eating locust" seems a far better name and an actual naming of said creature. --DCLM ☎ 06:11, June 19, 2017 (UTC)
