Talk:List of unproduced stories: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This article is a bit out of control. We need to create a lead that establishes its parameters and then move forward with the list that conforms to those parameters. Specifically, a story is not just a pitch. It must have been definitively greenlit, with some kind of actual commissioning of scripts. Just a few lines in a series bible or a letter to the production staff doesn't make a "lost story". There is, in other words, a difference between an '''unsold''' story and an '''unproduced''' story. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 21:01: Fri 23 Jun 2017</span> | This article is a bit out of control. We need to create a lead that establishes its parameters and then move forward with the list that conforms to those parameters. Specifically, a story is not just a pitch. It must have been definitively greenlit, with some kind of actual commissioning of scripts. Just a few lines in a series bible or a letter to the production staff doesn't make a "lost story". There is, in other words, a difference between an '''unsold''' story and an '''unproduced''' story. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 21:01: Fri 23 Jun 2017</span> | ||
: Indeed, when it comes to stories that were pitched and not taken up on, I think we don't need to have a page on them. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 22:24, June 25, 2017 (UTC) | : Indeed, when it comes to stories that were pitched and not taken up on, I think we don't need to have a page on them. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 22:24, June 25, 2017 (UTC) | ||
::looking at the list it seems to follow similar to Wikipedia an lists all the story's listed in reference works and i agree it needs trimming it one thing this list shod not do is simply become an list of titls as that whoud make the list useless for finding out about them these story's not having there own pagers will reduce the value of this kind of list as there is no info on the story's on this page with all details on the story pagers [[Special:Contributions/2.30.191.42|2.30.191.42]]<sup>[[User talk:2.30.191.42#top|talk to me]]</sup> 13:27, June 26, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:27, 26 June 2017
Defining the scope of this article
This article is a bit out of control. We need to create a lead that establishes its parameters and then move forward with the list that conforms to those parameters. Specifically, a story is not just a pitch. It must have been definitively greenlit, with some kind of actual commissioning of scripts. Just a few lines in a series bible or a letter to the production staff doesn't make a "lost story". There is, in other words, a difference between an unsold story and an unproduced story.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 21:01: Fri 23 Jun 2017
- Indeed, when it comes to stories that were pitched and not taken up on, I think we don't need to have a page on them. OS25 (Talk) 22:24, June 25, 2017 (UTC)
- looking at the list it seems to follow similar to Wikipedia an lists all the story's listed in reference works and i agree it needs trimming it one thing this list shod not do is simply become an list of titls as that whoud make the list useless for finding out about them these story's not having there own pagers will reduce the value of this kind of list as there is no info on the story's on this page with all details on the story pagers 2.30.191.42talk to me 13:27, June 26, 2017 (UTC)
