Talk:Bane (ingredient): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(question) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wasn't it not that 2% had an immunity to its effects, but that 2% didn't like the taste of it therefore would not be controlled by it? At best, the relevant phrase (which should be easy enough to find in a one-paragraph article) should read that 2% of the Human population were immune ''to its attictive effects''. {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 15:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | Wasn't it not that 2% had an immunity to its effects, but that 2% didn't like the taste of it therefore would not be controlled by it? At best, the relevant phrase (which should be easy enough to find in a one-paragraph article) should read that 2% of the Human population were immune ''to its attictive effects''. {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 15:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I don't know what that 2% meant either, honestly I don't remember any dialogue explaining this either. as I accidentally deleted my copy of the story I can't check. the BBC official sypnosis described the drink as "addictive" but ISTR that no such thing appeared on-screen. I suspect they may have cut some dialogue for timing reasons, leaving this vague. --[[User:***Stardizzy***|***Stardizzy***]] 16:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:58, 20 February 2007
Wasn't it not that 2% had an immunity to its effects, but that 2% didn't like the taste of it therefore would not be controlled by it? At best, the relevant phrase (which should be easy enough to find in a one-paragraph article) should read that 2% of the Human population were immune to its attictive effects. ~ Ghelæ -talk-contribs 15:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know what that 2% meant either, honestly I don't remember any dialogue explaining this either. as I accidentally deleted my copy of the story I can't check. the BBC official sypnosis described the drink as "addictive" but ISTR that no such thing appeared on-screen. I suspect they may have cut some dialogue for timing reasons, leaving this vague. --***Stardizzy*** 16:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
