Talk:Spyfall (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Borisashton (talk | contribs) (The Master) |
Borisashton (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== The Master == | == The Master == | ||
I am excited for the return of [[the Master]] but as per the instructions in {{tlx|current}}, shouldn't we be cautious about O's actual identity since the revelation happened in the cliffhanger? We only have to wait four days to confirm this so I wonder if it would be worth the effort to wait especially given the huge number of edits the introduction of a new Master causes. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:39, January 1, 2020 (UTC) | I am excited for the return of [[the Master]] but as per the instructions in {{tlx|current}}, shouldn't we be cautious about O's actual identity since the revelation happened in the cliffhanger? We only have to wait four days to confirm this so I wonder if it would be worth the effort to wait especially given the huge number of edits the introduction of a new Master causes. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:39, January 1, 2020 (UTC) | ||
: It's worth noting he is credited as "O" rather than the Master. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:58, January 1, 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:58, 1 January 2020
The Master
I am excited for the return of the Master but as per the instructions in {{current}}, shouldn't we be cautious about O's actual identity since the revelation happened in the cliffhanger? We only have to wait four days to confirm this so I wonder if it would be worth the effort to wait especially given the huge number of edits the introduction of a new Master causes. --Borisashton ☎ 20:39, January 1, 2020 (UTC)
- It's worth noting he is credited as "O" rather than the Master. --Borisashton ☎ 20:58, January 1, 2020 (UTC)
