Talk:Spyfall (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Borisashton (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I am excited for the return of [[the Master]] but as per the instructions in {{tlx|current}}, shouldn't we be cautious about O's actual identity since the revelation happened in the cliffhanger? We only have to wait four days to confirm this so I wonder if it would be worth the effort to wait especially given the huge number of edits the introduction of a new Master causes. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:39, January 1, 2020 (UTC) | I am excited for the return of [[the Master]] but as per the instructions in {{tlx|current}}, shouldn't we be cautious about O's actual identity since the revelation happened in the cliffhanger? We only have to wait four days to confirm this so I wonder if it would be worth the effort to wait especially given the huge number of edits the introduction of a new Master causes. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:39, January 1, 2020 (UTC) | ||
: It's worth noting he is credited as "O" rather than the Master. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:58, January 1, 2020 (UTC) | : It's worth noting he is credited as "O" rather than the Master. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:58, January 1, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::I agree, while I'm pretty sure he is credited as "O" simply to keep the reveal a surprise, considering there are reasonable doubts, and that it is after all a short wait to get more information, I think being cautious is a good idea. Better be safe than sorry after all, and once we have the full two parter, it should be easier to do all the edits that need to be done with a new incarnation. [[User:Liria10|Liria10]] [[User talk:Liria10|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:34, January 1, 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:34, 1 January 2020
The Master
I am excited for the return of the Master but as per the instructions in {{current}}, shouldn't we be cautious about O's actual identity since the revelation happened in the cliffhanger? We only have to wait four days to confirm this so I wonder if it would be worth the effort to wait especially given the huge number of edits the introduction of a new Master causes. --Borisashton ☎ 20:39, January 1, 2020 (UTC)
- It's worth noting he is credited as "O" rather than the Master. --Borisashton ☎ 20:58, January 1, 2020 (UTC)
- I agree, while I'm pretty sure he is credited as "O" simply to keep the reveal a surprise, considering there are reasonable doubts, and that it is after all a short wait to get more information, I think being cautious is a good idea. Better be safe than sorry after all, and once we have the full two parter, it should be easier to do all the edits that need to be done with a new incarnation. Liria10 ☎ 21:34, January 1, 2020 (UTC)
