The Uncle: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Bot: Cosmetic changes) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[The Doctor]], according to their [[Seventh Doctor|seventh incarnation]], had '''an [[uncle]]'''. While his [[mind]] was within the [[time brain]], the Doctor, in response to [[Albert Einstein]]'s statement, "It is a fundamental postulate that all motion is relative," told him that Einstein would not say that if he had met his uncle. ([[TV]]: ''[[Time and the Rani (TV story)|Time and the Rani]]'') | [[The Doctor]], according to their [[Seventh Doctor|seventh incarnation]], had '''an [[uncle]]'''. While his [[mind]] was within the [[time brain]], the Doctor, in response to [[Albert Einstein]]'s statement, "It is a fundamental postulate that all motion is relative," told him that Einstein would not say that if he had met his uncle. ([[TV]]: ''[[Time and the Rani (TV story)|Time and the Rani]]'') | ||
{{TitleSort}} | {{TitleSort}} | ||
[[Category:Relatives of the Doctor]] | [[Category:Relatives of the Doctor]] | ||
[[Category:Residents of Gallifrey]] | [[Category:Residents of Gallifrey]] | ||
[[Category:Individuals with unknown names]] | [[Category:Individuals with unknown names]] |
Revision as of 19:58, 3 September 2020
It should be relocated at The Uncle because Time and the Rani had the Doctor refer to his uncle, singular; then, once again, in The Eternity Clock, the Doctor mentions his uncle in a context making it clearthat he has only one. Occam's Razor suggests The Eternity Clock was referencing the same singular Uncle, not introducing a contradictory second uncle.
Talk about it here or check the revision history for additional comments.
The Doctor, according to their seventh incarnation, had an uncle. While his mind was within the time brain, the Doctor, in response to Albert Einstein's statement, "It is a fundamental postulate that all motion is relative," told him that Einstein would not say that if he had met his uncle. (TV: Time and the Rani)