Talk:Series 4 (SJA): Difference between revisions
(→According To Wikipedia...: reply and new thread) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Reputable sources only, please== | ==Reputable sources only, please== | ||
According to the Doctor Who News Page the BBC has more or less confirmed Series 4 by casting around for a producer. Other than this information, and the safe-bet assumption that Lis Sladen will be back we can't say anything else until the BBC or a reputable source like DWM confirms. That means we can't list K-9 because we don't know what impact the spin-off is going to have on whether the BBC brings him back. We can't just list "Maria may return" in the rumors without citing a source, because we could just as easily add "The Doctor might make a return appearance". It's meaningless unless we cite a source. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 01:51, January 20, 2010 (UTC) | According to the Doctor Who News Page the BBC has more or less confirmed Series 4 by casting around for a producer. Other than this information, and the safe-bet assumption that Lis Sladen will be back we can't say anything else until the BBC or a reputable source like DWM confirms. That means we can't list K-9 because we don't know what impact the spin-off is going to have on whether the BBC brings him back. We can't just list "Maria may return" in the rumors without citing a source, because we could just as easily add "The Doctor might make a return appearance". It's meaningless unless we cite a source. If too many pieces of nonsense are posted like that Miley Cyrus thing we may have to semi-protect the article. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 01:51, January 20, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:52, 20 January 2010
Miley Cyrus?
Until a reliable source is cited for the Miley Cyrus credit, I'm deleting it. It seems incredibly unlikely that Miley Cyrus would be a character in the Sarah Jane Adventures. Jim393 18:17, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
According To Wikipedia...
Joseph Lidster and Gareth Roberts are writing for series 4, with Roberts writing a two-part serial and an hour long special. They both site thier agent websites as a source. Reckon it's safe to put them up in the article? Excalibur-117 18:55, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, nevermind, the writers don't get mentioned in the SJA series articles. Excalibur-117 19:02, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
- And Wikipedia can't be used as a source as it's not peer reviewed meaning anyone can most B.S. 23skidoo 01:51, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
Reputable sources only, please
According to the Doctor Who News Page the BBC has more or less confirmed Series 4 by casting around for a producer. Other than this information, and the safe-bet assumption that Lis Sladen will be back we can't say anything else until the BBC or a reputable source like DWM confirms. That means we can't list K-9 because we don't know what impact the spin-off is going to have on whether the BBC brings him back. We can't just list "Maria may return" in the rumors without citing a source, because we could just as easily add "The Doctor might make a return appearance". It's meaningless unless we cite a source. If too many pieces of nonsense are posted like that Miley Cyrus thing we may have to semi-protect the article. 23skidoo 01:51, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
