Forum:Categories / Prefixes: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:simple answer: we haven't come up with those prefixes yet. IMO, I think the Short Trips stories could have their own category to embrace both the BBC Books and Big Fnish anthologies. --[[User:***Stardizzy***|***Stardizzy***]] 15:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | :simple answer: we haven't come up with those prefixes yet. IMO, I think the Short Trips stories could have their own category to embrace both the BBC Books and Big Fnish anthologies. --[[User:***Stardizzy***|***Stardizzy***]] 15:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:13, 3 March 2007
Index → Panopticon → Categories / Prefixes
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Short stories
Er, I'm just wondering what the procedure is for categorising short stories of various kinds - particularly what prefix to use when referring to short stories published in places like Short Trips (both BBC and Big Finish versions).
The BFA prefix doesn't seem appropriate for the Big Finish version as that appears to specify audio stories only (which these aren't) while using PDA/EDA for the BBC collections implies the short stories are the same kind of thing as a novel (which seems unsatisfactory to me for all sorts of reasons). Gai-jin 15:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Gai-jin
- simple answer: we haven't come up with those prefixes yet. IMO, I think the Short Trips stories could have their own category to embrace both the BBC Books and Big Fnish anthologies. --***Stardizzy*** 15:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
