Talk:Timeline: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with '==Proposed deletion== As the lead notes, there's already: category:timeline which does the same thing, and more completely. Or, if you don't like that, how about [[:catego…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Proposed deletion== | ==Proposed deletion== | ||
As the lead notes, there's already: [[:category:timeline]] which does the same thing, and more completely. Or, if you don't like that, how about [[:category:centuries]]. This "article" adds nothing in terms of explanatory text, and it's not even written in an in-universe style. There's really no need for this redundancy whatsoever. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 21:54, February 5, 2010 (UTC) | As the lead notes, there's already: [[:category:timeline]] which does the same thing, and more completely. Or, if you don't like that, how about [[:category:centuries]]. This "article" adds nothing in terms of explanatory text, and it's not even written in an in-universe style. There's really no need for this redundancy whatsoever. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 21:54, February 5, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Just noticed those categories aren't well organized. So I see the need for this page: people are being lazy. If instead they organzied the category page and put some explanatory text at the top, it'd be fine, and the wiki would be cleaner. Still think this page should go. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 21:56, February 5, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:56, 5 February 2010
Proposed deletion
As the lead notes, there's already: category:timeline which does the same thing, and more completely. Or, if you don't like that, how about category:centuries. This "article" adds nothing in terms of explanatory text, and it's not even written in an in-universe style. There's really no need for this redundancy whatsoever. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 21:54, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Just noticed those categories aren't well organized. So I see the need for this page: people are being lazy. If instead they organzied the category page and put some explanatory text at the top, it'd be fine, and the wiki would be cleaner. Still think this page should go. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 21:56, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
