Talk:A Better World (short story): Difference between revisions
NateBumber (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Precedent? == Devil's advocate mode, to preempt any complaints or accusations: The summary of this story on Auteur is very appropriate, and perhaps I would even support...") |
Borisashton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Precedent? == | == Precedent? == | ||
Devil's advocate mode, to preempt any complaints or accusations: The summary of this story on [[Auteur]] is very appropriate, and perhaps I would even support an overview of all [https://www.doctorwholockdown.com/fan-gallery "Fan Gallery"] fan fiction on our ''[[Doctor Who: Lockdown!]]'' page along the lines of what's proposed on [[Talk:Charity publication#Anthology section expansion?]]. But is there any precedent for the creation of a full page for this story? I understand that Auteur is fully licensed, but there are plenty of charity stories which include one or multiple licensed characters (usually a character that the author personally owns, but not always), and we don't have pages for any of those. I wouldn't be opposed to the change, but it would certainly be a change! – [[User:NateBumber|<span title="User:NateBumber">N8</span>]] ([[User_talk:NateBumber|<span title="Leave me a note">☎</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/NateBumber|<span title="Spy on my edits">👁️</span>]]) 18:41, November 16, 2020 (UTC) | Devil's advocate mode, to preempt any complaints or accusations: The summary of this story on [[Auteur]] is very appropriate, and perhaps I would even support an overview of all [https://www.doctorwholockdown.com/fan-gallery "Fan Gallery"] fan fiction on our ''[[Doctor Who: Lockdown!]]'' page along the lines of what's proposed on [[Talk:Charity publication#Anthology section expansion?]]. But is there any precedent for the creation of a full page for this story? I understand that Auteur is fully licensed, but there are plenty of charity stories which include one or multiple licensed characters (usually a character that the author personally owns, but not always), and we don't have pages for any of those. I wouldn't be opposed to the change, but it would certainly be a change! – [[User:NateBumber|<span title="User:NateBumber">N8</span>]] ([[User_talk:NateBumber|<span title="Leave me a note">☎</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/NateBumber|<span title="Spy on my edits">👁️</span>]]) 18:41, November 16, 2020 (UTC) | ||
: See [[Talk:Doctor Who: Lockdown!#Announcement on 'The Fan Gallery']] for admin [[User:Scrooge MacDuck]]'s ruling on whether they should get individual pages. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:46, November 16, 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:46, 16 November 2020
Precedent?
Devil's advocate mode, to preempt any complaints or accusations: The summary of this story on Auteur is very appropriate, and perhaps I would even support an overview of all "Fan Gallery" fan fiction on our Doctor Who: Lockdown! page along the lines of what's proposed on Talk:Charity publication#Anthology section expansion?. But is there any precedent for the creation of a full page for this story? I understand that Auteur is fully licensed, but there are plenty of charity stories which include one or multiple licensed characters (usually a character that the author personally owns, but not always), and we don't have pages for any of those. I wouldn't be opposed to the change, but it would certainly be a change! – N8 (☎/👁️) 18:41, November 16, 2020 (UTC)
- See Talk:Doctor Who: Lockdown!#Announcement on 'The Fan Gallery' for admin User:Scrooge MacDuck's ruling on whether they should get individual pages. --Borisashton ☎ 18:46, November 16, 2020 (UTC)
