Talk:The Kidnappers (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Invalidity == | == Invalidity == | ||
Once again, for what I feel is the millionth time, why is this story [[T:VALID|invalid]]? I can [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/The_Kidnappers?diff=prev&oldid=2110092 see that] User:[[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|DENCH-and-PALMER]] added a {{tlx|notdwu}} tag in 2016. I ''would'' call this spurious, if it were not for a few mysterious forum | Once again, for what I feel is the millionth time, why is this story [[T:VALID|invalid]]? I can [https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/The_Kidnappers?diff=prev&oldid=2110092 see that] User:[[User:DENCH-and-PALMER|DENCH-and-PALMER]] added a {{tlx|notdwu}} tag in 2016. I ''would'' call this spurious, if it were not for a few mysterious forum posts linking to ''The Kidnappers''. If anybody knows if this story has a rationale for its invalidity, please let me know. If not, and it was assumed as it was about ''[[Doctor Who (N-Space)|Doctor Who]]'' "therefore it couldn't be possibly be in the DWU", I swear to bleeding Rassilon... [[User:Epsilon the Eternal|Epsilon the Eternal]] [[User talk:Epsilon the Eternal|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:44, 9 January 2021
Invalidity
Once again, for what I feel is the millionth time, why is this story invalid? I can see that User:DENCH-and-PALMER added a {{notdwu}} tag in 2016. I would call this spurious, if it were not for a few mysterious forum posts linking to The Kidnappers. If anybody knows if this story has a rationale for its invalidity, please let me know. If not, and it was assumed as it was about Doctor Who "therefore it couldn't be possibly be in the DWU", I swear to bleeding Rassilon... Epsilon the Eternal ☎ 05:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)