Talk:Shrek: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: 2017 source edit
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 16: Line 16:
== What about the background castle? ==
== What about the background castle? ==


This is ''really'' stretching it, but is the [[castle]] in the background technically considered valid as a [[:Category:Fictional locations from the real world|fictional location from the real world]]?
This is ''really'' stretching it, but is the [[castle]] in the background technically considered valid as a [[:Category:Fictional locations from the real world|fictional location from the real world]]?[[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:51, 5 April 2022

Characters shown on the poster?

Should the characters of Shrek, Donkey, Fiona, and the dragon have their own pages? They're fictional characters from the real world, much like other characters with their own pages. Cookieboy 2005 10:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

May be stretching it with Dragon, considering she looks like a blob on the cover due to the low quality, but you should be fine to create pages for these characters if you makes sure to add a {{Conjecture}} template. However, you would have to use "(fictional character)" as a dab term instead of "(Shrek)", as we don't cover Shrek. 12:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
First of all, why would these characters even need a page if this is their only appearance? Secondly, isn't that breaking some sort of rule about putting real-world information onto pages as their counterparts in the DWU could be completely different. DrWHOCorrieFan 12:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
The above is true: T:NO RW. When in doubt, ask an admin. Shambala108 13:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
@DrWHOCorrieFan - we don't decide to create pages based upon notability on this Wiki. One appearance, no, even a mention is more than enough grounds to create a page. Also, we wouldn't be using any real world information on these pages other than their names, which is expressly allowed so long as we mark the page with {{Conjecture}}: we have a massive amount of precendent, and none of it breaks T:NO RW.
@Shambala108 - users are perfectly allowed to ask other non-admin users for advice. Admins, while of course extremely knowledgable, are not of a higher rank than other equally-knowledgable non-admins. 14:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
@User:Epsilon the Eternal while your second comment is certainly true, new users have no way of knowing how experienced and knowledgeable a non-admin user is. I've seen many relatively new users give (incorrect) advice to other new users in my time on this wiki. It's easier to ask an admin, who are listed on the page I cited, and who are marked by the different font color and size of our names. I never made any direct or indirect statement that admins are "of a higher rank" than others. As an admin I often use my discussion comments to educate users. No need to read more into my comments or take offense. Shambala108 14:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Fair enough @Shambala108, I didn't consider non-regular users giving out advice. Sorry if any offense was caused by my comment.

14:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

What about the background castle?

This is really stretching it, but is the castle in the background technically considered valid as a fictional location from the real world?Cookieboy 2005 19:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)