User talk:Alden Loveshade: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "== Spoilers == Hi please make sure to read our spoiler policy at Tardis:Spoiler policy. No matter how official something is, on this wiki it's considered a spoiler until...")
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 1: Line 1:
== Spoilers ==
== Spoilers ==
Hi please make sure to read our spoiler policy at [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]]. No matter how official something is, on this wiki it's considered a spoiler until '''air time''' of an episode with the information. The posts you have made on the discussion board have been deleted because you did not put them in the Spoilers category. Thanks [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi please make sure to read our spoiler policy at [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]]. No matter how official something is, on this wiki it's considered a spoiler until '''air time''' of an episode with the information. The posts you have made on the discussion board have been deleted because you did not put them in the Spoilers category. Thanks [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
:As talk pages are no longer fully supported by Fandom, I'm posting this both as an edit to the original post on my talk page and am posting it on the talk page of the editor who posted on my talk page.
:As it happens, I did read the Spoiler policy and also the Spoiler page which defines spoiler differently. By both of those, I personally don't see this as a spoiler. Among many other sources, it's been publicly reported as headline news (i.e. even without reading the article, the information is in the headline) by:
# scifi.radio
# huffpost.com
# wikipedia.org
# cnn.com
# hollywoodlife.com
# cbsnews.com
# nbcnews.com
# abcnews.go.com
# abc.net.au
# sabcnews.com
# flipboard.com
# thesun.co.uk
# the-sun.com
# theverge.com
# popbuzz.com
# radiotimes.com
# npr.com
# news.yahoo.com
# theguardian.com
# vulture.com
# columbian.com
# euronews.com
# theglobalherald.com
# nytimes.com
# people.com
# buzzfeednews.com
# theguardian.com
# usatoday.com
# wusfnews.wusf.usf.edu
# usmagazine.com
# ign.com
# ew.com
# collider.com
# variety.com
# wsj.com
# tvline.com
# popsugar.com
# insider.com
# aol.com
# digitalspy.com
# msn.com
# sfgate.com
# upi.com
# reuters.com
# bbc.com
:Even doing just a basic search for "Doctor Who," that information pops up among of the top results.
:"Spoiler" is apparently applied on this wiki in a way that doesn't fit English language definitions of the word.
:For example, Merriam-Webster: "information about the plot of a motion picture or TV program that can spoil a viewer's sense of surprise or :suspense" also "a person who discloses such information."
:Perhaps you might want to find or even create a word that would have the definition you intend. This could be a word that would clarify that you do not allow on-topic public information that appears in so many sources that it's hard to avoid seeing it.
:I hope this helps!
:[[User:Alden Loveshade|Alden Loveshade]] [[User talk:Alden Loveshade#top|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:26, 13 May 2022

Spoilers

Hi please make sure to read our spoiler policy at Tardis:Spoiler policy. No matter how official something is, on this wiki it's considered a spoiler until air time of an episode with the information. The posts you have made on the discussion board have been deleted because you did not put them in the Spoilers category. Thanks Shambala108 03:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

As talk pages are no longer fully supported by Fandom, I'm posting this both as an edit to the original post on my talk page and am posting it on the talk page of the editor who posted on my talk page.
As it happens, I did read the Spoiler policy and also the Spoiler page which defines spoiler differently. By both of those, I personally don't see this as a spoiler. Among many other sources, it's been publicly reported as headline news (i.e. even without reading the article, the information is in the headline) by:
  1. scifi.radio
  2. huffpost.com
  3. wikipedia.org
  4. cnn.com
  5. hollywoodlife.com
  6. cbsnews.com
  7. nbcnews.com
  8. abcnews.go.com
  9. abc.net.au
  10. sabcnews.com
  11. flipboard.com
  12. thesun.co.uk
  13. the-sun.com
  14. theverge.com
  15. popbuzz.com
  16. radiotimes.com
  17. npr.com
  18. news.yahoo.com
  19. theguardian.com
  20. vulture.com
  21. columbian.com
  22. euronews.com
  23. theglobalherald.com
  24. nytimes.com
  25. people.com
  26. buzzfeednews.com
  27. theguardian.com
  28. usatoday.com
  29. wusfnews.wusf.usf.edu
  30. usmagazine.com
  31. ign.com
  32. ew.com
  33. collider.com
  34. variety.com
  35. wsj.com
  36. tvline.com
  37. popsugar.com
  38. insider.com
  39. aol.com
  40. digitalspy.com
  41. msn.com
  42. sfgate.com
  43. upi.com
  44. reuters.com
  45. bbc.com
Even doing just a basic search for "Doctor Who," that information pops up among of the top results.
"Spoiler" is apparently applied on this wiki in a way that doesn't fit English language definitions of the word.
For example, Merriam-Webster: "information about the plot of a motion picture or TV program that can spoil a viewer's sense of surprise or :suspense" also "a person who discloses such information."
Perhaps you might want to find or even create a word that would have the definition you intend. This could be a word that would clarify that you do not allow on-topic public information that appears in so many sources that it's hard to avoid seeing it.
I hope this helps!
Alden Loveshade 19:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)