54
edits
More actions
→Timeline
Mc hammark (talk | contribs) |
Bttsstewart (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 326: | Line 326: | ||
Anyway, I'm getting off subject; is the above timeline correct? [[User:Bttsstewart|Bttsstewart]] 10:58, April 17, 2010 (UTC) | Anyway, I'm getting off subject; is the above timeline correct? [[User:Bttsstewart|Bttsstewart]] 10:58, April 17, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*I'm not sure if the timeline is correct, but all these little inconsistencies might be corrected this series. The Doctor said that the crack was two points in time which should have never met touched together. Now, since it's been seen in several places I think it's safe to assume that these cracks are all over the place (and not just the one same crack). So if they're all over the place, I'd say that all these inconsistencies with dates could be put up to the cracks. [[User:Mc hammark|Mc hammark]] 11:03, April 17, 2010 (UTC) | *I'm not sure if the timeline is correct, but all these little inconsistencies might be corrected this series. The Doctor said that the crack was two points in time which should have never met touched together. Now, since it's been seen in several places I think it's safe to assume that these cracks are all over the place (and not just the one same crack). So if they're all over the place, I'd say that all these inconsistencies with dates could be put up to the cracks. [[User:Mc hammark|Mc hammark]] 11:03, April 17, 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Once again it's shown that it's impossible for Doctor Who to have a continuity error ;-) But still, I think it'd be best (just for my own personal continuity obsession OCD) to say that Jackie Tyler made a typo while making the missing posters...This places the Whoniverse at the same time as ours once again, fixing everything forever! I like the "cracks in time" solution to the problem too. [[User:Bttsstewart|Bttsstewart]] 11:08, April 17, 2010 (UTC) | |||