Talk:Dragon (fictional character): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Deletion tag states "Barely visible in the television story and is therefore too tenuous to have a page." and I agree. The background of the image is too blurry to make out the characters in front (Shrek, Fiona and donkey), much less the dragon in the background. I plan to delete this particular page, but I'll wait a bit to allow for arguments against deletion. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC) | Deletion tag states "Barely visible in the television story and is therefore too tenuous to have a page." and I agree. The background of the image is too blurry to make out the characters in front (Shrek, Fiona and donkey), much less the dragon in the background. I plan to delete this particular page, but I'll wait a bit to allow for arguments against deletion. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
: I think all those pages mentioned (Dragon, Shrek, Fiona, etc) should be deleted. [[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] [[User talk:DrWHOCorrieFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC) | : I think all those pages mentioned (Dragon, Shrek, Fiona, etc) should be deleted. [[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] [[User talk:DrWHOCorrieFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
:: Actually, there was '''already''' a discussion and closure about all of these at [[Talk:Shrek]]. The conclusion was: | |||
{{quote| | |||
* '''Keep''' the image but, for now, don't use it in the main namespace. | |||
* '''Keep''' [[Shrek]] and [[Shrek (fictional character)]]. Probably [[Donkey (fictional character)]] and [[Fiona (fictional character)]] as well, though let's be clear they are not terribly useful pages and editing time might, in future, better be spent elsewhere. | |||
* '''Delete''' [[Dragon (fictional character)]] and [[Dragon's Keep]]. Notes of their blurry cameo should be limited to the BTS section of [[Shrek]] or [[Dragon]], and perhaps the "Story notes" of [[Dead Man Walking (TV story)]].|Talk:Shrek}} | |||
:: (It ''is'' my mistake for not then having carried this out properly by going through with the deletion of this page, and I take responsibility for that.) | |||
:: In any case, unless new evidence is found, there should not be further discussion about deleting the remaining pages. <span style="color: #baa3d6;font-family:Comic Sans;">[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']]</span> <span style="color: #baa3d6;">[[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]]</span> 23:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 18 June 2022
Proposed deletion[[edit source]]
Deletion tag states "Barely visible in the television story and is therefore too tenuous to have a page." and I agree. The background of the image is too blurry to make out the characters in front (Shrek, Fiona and donkey), much less the dragon in the background. I plan to delete this particular page, but I'll wait a bit to allow for arguments against deletion. Shambala108 ☎ 21:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think all those pages mentioned (Dragon, Shrek, Fiona, etc) should be deleted. DrWHOCorrieFan ☎ 23:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, there was already a discussion and closure about all of these at Talk:Shrek. The conclusion was:
- Keep the image but, for now, don't use it in the main namespace.
- Keep Shrek and Shrek (fictional character). Probably Donkey (fictional character) and Fiona (fictional character) as well, though let's be clear they are not terribly useful pages and editing time might, in future, better be spent elsewhere.
- Delete Dragon (fictional character) and Dragon's Keep. Notes of their blurry cameo should be limited to the BTS section of Shrek or Dragon, and perhaps the "Story notes" of Dead Man Walking (TV story).
- (It is my mistake for not then having carried this out properly by going through with the deletion of this page, and I take responsibility for that.)
- In any case, unless new evidence is found, there should not be further discussion about deleting the remaining pages. Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 23:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
