Talk:Blink (TV story)

Is it me, or does Billy Shipton have a Jamaican accent, or at least from somewhere in the Caribbean?--MaGnUs 06:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

The Angels actors

Is there is a list anywhere of the actors who played the Angels? They should be listed here. 23skidoo 00:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

How did the TARDIS move to Wester Drumlins?

Roughly mid episode the TARDIS is in Police storage, but by the end it has moved to the basement of Wester Drumlins (where it's found by Sally etc etc). Since The Doctor is in 1969 at this point then it wasn't piloted there, and the Angels don't have access. The only thing I can think of is that the Angels moved it, but how? No matter how fast they are it seems impossible to move a large blue box across a populated area without someone seeing them, and therefore trapping them in Quantum Lock. (Also, not really sure how it got into the basement anyway, I wouldn't want to move a Police Box down a flight of stairs)

Any other theories? AmazingJim 06:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Maybe the Doctor parked the TARDIS in Wester Drumlins to take care of some monster, and then he and Martha got transported back in time by the Weeping Angels, leaving the TARDIS there. In fact, he could get transported to 1969 soon after the end of the episode, because he was in the area at that time.Doc Who10 07:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry DocWho10, maybe I wasn't clear. When Sally first meets Billy Shipton the TARDIS is in a Police Garage with the cars found at the house, which your explanation for is probably right, but how did it move from the Garage to the House basement later in the episode. The Police probably moved it from the house to the garage on a truck (seen that done elsewhere), but how did it get back to the house between the time Billy dissappeared and Sally found it after watching the DVD. There's nothing on the DVD commentary track about it either, just checked that through today. AmazingJim

The implication was that the Angels moved it. But as you say, that seems difficult to pull off. Monkey with a Gun 02:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. I see your point. Sorry, I mustn't have been thinking (I just havn't seen that episode here, I thought you meant that the TARDIS was at the house in the beginning of the story, or something like that). I wonder how it happened? - Doc Who10 04:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm certain that the weeping angels moved it.

they probably have teleport powers/moved it through a way that no one saw them, anyway I heard they're coming back in series 5 so I guess the answer lies there

I'll point out three things here. One: Nobody ever notices the Police Box even when it's blatantly out of place. Two: Nobody bothers to worry about a stone statue. Even an out of place one. Three: The Angels have had literally eons perfecting the art of being sneaky. MrCatharsis 20:54, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Reference of the year gap at the end

I'm fairly sure I remember seeing the "One Year Later" message in the broadcast...ProtoKun7 22:07, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

• I never saw it on the CBC in Canada and it's not on the DVD. It was originally scripted - confirmed in several sources - but I can't find anything to support that it actually appeared on screen. Maybe in only certain parts of the UK? 23skidoo 20:55, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
• It has to be included as canon - it has "One Year Later" clearly labelled between the scene where Sally and Larry leave the Weeping Angles and the establishing shot of the DVD store on my DVD set for Season 3 (region 2); I cannot believe this is in doubt. I must go back on my recording of the broadcast version, I can believe that it might not have been present there. But, clearly, the producers decided that it was canon enough to be later included on the DVDs, and this article should reflect that. It currently has a doubt cast on the duration of time passed at one point in the article.

Discontinuity or self-referentiality?

I rather take exception with the fact that this is included in the discontinuity and errors section:

"They [the characters] look away from the angels many times but they [the angels] don't move. Someone or thing is watching them. Some have proposed, semi-jokingly, that they are reacting to the camera and the viewer observing them."

This is an excellent (and very elegant) example of the self-referentiality device (widely used in many television shows, movies and books), by which the audience becomes part of the action. The episode deliberately breaks the "fourth wall" between the action and the audience. As a television criticism junkie, I am endlessly tickled by the beauty of this device and the subtlety with which it's used here.

Come weigh in on the subject on my blog, at http://bit.ly/4W6rxA!

• Although it's an interesting concept, it is an error in the context of Doctor Who as, in theory, it's not supposed to break the 4th wall. And, most important, no one connected with the series has come forward to say it was intentional. That said, whether it's actually an error is unclear because nothing in the episode suggests exactly how they move. Yes, the Doctor says they move quickly. But so does a cat - after spending 20 minutes sitting motionless watching the fly on the wall before it pounces. That's exactly how I saw the Angels' movement. 23skidoo 20:58, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

• Could it have something to do with looking at them from the corner of one's eye? A perception filter can make you miss an entire room, but you still see it from the corner of your eye, just don't take notice of it. Therefore maybe one should take the 'looking at them' more broadly? --Samoth 20:17, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

• Well, this is one of the reasons the discon sections are getting moved to Forum:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes. This tone, and especially the reference to a blog, are clearly inappropriate to the tone of an encyclopedia article. However, I have no problem with that kind of language, once the section is moved to the Forums. I'll just go do that now, so that it doesn't trouble us any longer here. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 20:26, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

The cell phone problem

Some horror/thriller writers (well, the less creative ones) hate mobile phones; not much of a story if the protagonists can call for help. Living before them, in, say, 1963, normally avoids this "problem" — but not if you're the Doctor with a certain sonic tool! So, any good fan theories on why he couldn't have used universal roaming with Martha's phone?

Oh wait, I've got one now — he knew he would have to go through the rigmarole of the DVD extras, because thanks to Sally's green file, he knew it had "already happened", and he would need to avoid a paradox. Never mind… maybe? Now I'm suddenly thinking of a different, closely related question — why did he need Lawrence's shorthand of Sally's words at all? He could have just read his own lines, whose "true" author is in fact not him but whatever it is that creates paradoxically "appearing" information in stable time loops (like if you sent Hamlet back in time to Shakespeare, and he copies it, and it's the play you send back, etc). Then again, maybe having some of her words there would help give him context for his words, making him deliver them right — perhaps even the Doctor's brain can hurt thinking about time travel! 72.72.237.120 23:39, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

What movie is being watched when Sally first enters the video store?

Larry's colleague is watching a video when Sally first enters the store (to give Larry the message from his sister). Has anyone figured out which film? 76.200.189.217 00:40, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Larry

Is it just me or does the Doctor look surprised when he sees Larry? Mc hammark 20:06, April 22, 2010 (UTC)