Talk:Angel Bob: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
(→Spelling: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I would assume the major reason for the proposed deletion is the many violations of the manual of style: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Tardis:Manual_of_Style (Recommended reading for any editors). The Spelling alone is enough to cause headaches (and on this talk page - "Byzantium","essentially" and "individual" jump out). You should also sign your posts (by clicking the signature button) on a talk page. [[Special:Contributions/86.134.188.188|86.134.188.188]] 21:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC) | I would assume the major reason for the proposed deletion is the many violations of the manual of style: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Tardis:Manual_of_Style (Recommended reading for any editors). The Spelling alone is enough to cause headaches (and on this talk page - "Byzantium","essentially" and "individual" jump out). You should also sign your posts (by clicking the signature button) on a talk page. [[Special:Contributions/86.134.188.188|86.134.188.188]] 21:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Spelling == | |||
For your information I was going to check it I just like to get my ideas down first. | |||
Revision as of 21:39, 24 April 2010
This angel is esetially a charecter in its own right and should be allowed to stay. The ood page has Sigma so why cant this belong to the angels has a notable indavidual charecter page.
I would assume the major reason for the proposed deletion is the many violations of the manual of style: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Tardis:Manual_of_Style (Recommended reading for any editors). The Spelling alone is enough to cause headaches (and on this talk page - "Byzantium","essentially" and "individual" jump out). You should also sign your posts (by clicking the signature button) on a talk page. 86.134.188.188 21:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
Spelling
For your information I was going to check it I just like to get my ideas down first.
