Talk:Angel Bob: Difference between revisions
Raven's wing (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I would assume the major reason for the proposed deletion is the many violations of the manual of style: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Tardis:Manual_of_Style (Recommended reading for any editors). The Spelling alone is enough to cause headaches (and on this talk page - "Byzantium","essentially" and "individual" jump out). You should also sign your posts (by clicking the signature button) on a talk page. [[Special:Contributions/86.134.188.188|86.134.188.188]] 21:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC) | I would assume the major reason for the proposed deletion is the many violations of the manual of style: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Tardis:Manual_of_Style (Recommended reading for any editors). The Spelling alone is enough to cause headaches (and on this talk page - "Byzantium","essentially" and "individual" jump out). You should also sign your posts (by clicking the signature button) on a talk page. [[Special:Contributions/86.134.188.188|86.134.188.188]] 21:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Well, sure, there are copyediting problems here, starting with the title. But that alone isn't enough to get rid of the article. That's cause to help the editor, at least by applying a cleanup and a rename tag. I'm gonna do that, and throw in a conjecture tag too. We honestly don't know what the name of this individual is yet. Maybe we'll never know. But it ''is'' an individual, and does deserve a page of some kind. No need to completely throw out another editor's work, in this case. We'll know better how to handle this in a week. In the meantime, I vigorously oppose deletion. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 21:45, April 24, 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Spelling == | == Spelling == | ||
Revision as of 21:45, 24 April 2010
This angel is esetially a charecter in its own right and should be allowed to stay. The ood page has Sigma so why cant this belong to the angels has a notable indavidual charecter page.
I would assume the major reason for the proposed deletion is the many violations of the manual of style: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Tardis:Manual_of_Style (Recommended reading for any editors). The Spelling alone is enough to cause headaches (and on this talk page - "Byzantium","essentially" and "individual" jump out). You should also sign your posts (by clicking the signature button) on a talk page. 86.134.188.188 21:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, sure, there are copyediting problems here, starting with the title. But that alone isn't enough to get rid of the article. That's cause to help the editor, at least by applying a cleanup and a rename tag. I'm gonna do that, and throw in a conjecture tag too. We honestly don't know what the name of this individual is yet. Maybe we'll never know. But it is an individual, and does deserve a page of some kind. No need to completely throw out another editor's work, in this case. We'll know better how to handle this in a week. In the meantime, I vigorously oppose deletion. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 21:45, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
Spelling
For your information I was going to check it I just like to get my ideas down first.
Done it for you. Raven's wing 21:43, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
