Laws of Lunch: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: Manual revert |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[Tenth Doctor]] once offhandedly claimed to [[Donna Noble]] that the '''Laws of Lunch''' overruled the [[Laws of Time]], defending his actions in saving [[Lobus Caecilius]] and family from the eruption of [[Mount Vesuvius]] | The [[Tenth Doctor]] once offhandedly claimed to [[Donna Noble]] that the '''Laws of Lunch''' overruled the [[Laws of Time]], defending his actions in saving [[Lobus Caecilius]] and family from the eruption of [[Mount Vesuvius]] in [[Pompeii]]. | ||
Specifically, he felt it would be ''rude'' to let someone die after they offered him a "nice [[lunch]]", as did Caecilius. ([[PROSE]]: ''[[The Fires of Pompeii (novelisation)|The Fires of Pompeii]]'') | Specifically, he felt it would be ''rude'' to let someone die after they offered him a "nice [[lunch]]", as did Caecilius. ([[PROSE]]: ''[[The Fires of Pompeii (novelisation)|The Fires of Pompeii]]'') | ||
Latest revision as of 20:58, 4 December 2022
The Tenth Doctor once offhandedly claimed to Donna Noble that the Laws of Lunch overruled the Laws of Time, defending his actions in saving Lobus Caecilius and family from the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in Pompeii.
Specifically, he felt it would be rude to let someone die after they offered him a "nice lunch", as did Caecilius. (PROSE: The Fires of Pompeii)
