Talk:Intru-da-window: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::[[Intruder window]] or [[Intruda window]] would be a noun though. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 20:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC) | :::[[Intruder window]] or [[Intruda window]] would be a noun though. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 20:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: It would be, but there's no such thing as an "intruder window". It's just wordplay. [[User:Jack "BtR" Saxon|Jack "BtR" Saxon]] [[User talk:Jack "BtR" Saxon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:44, 25 March 2023
Why is the at page even the candidate for deletion? – The preceding unsigned comment was added by SJM-123 (talk • contribs) .
Reason
Why is the page a candidate for deletion if it is a canon joke said by multiple doctor who characters? – The preceding unsigned comment was added by SJM-123 (talk • contribs) .
- Like the deletion template on the page says, I don't believe that punchlines to jokes deserve their own page. Jack "BtR" Saxon ☎ 20:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Intruder window or Intruda window would be a noun though. – n8 (☎) 20:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- It would be, but there's no such thing as an "intruder window". It's just wordplay. Jack "BtR" Saxon ☎ 20:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
