User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20190809230951/@comment-6032121-20201007165627: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This was resolved long ago as a simple misunderstand. The ''Files'' themselves aren't stories, they're publications, so the "Invalid" tag isn't so much incorrect as misplaced. The stories ''in'' the publication obviously remain valid, and any non-narrative material in them remains ''in''valid. | This was resolved long ago as a simple misunderstand. The ''Files'' themselves aren't stories, they're publications, so the "Invalid" tag isn't so much incorrect as misplaced. The stories ''in'' the publication obviously remain valid, and any non-narrative material in them remains ''in''valid. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190809230951-1432718/20201007165627-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:27, 27 April 2023
This was resolved long ago as a simple misunderstand. The Files themselves aren't stories, they're publications, so the "Invalid" tag isn't so much incorrect as misplaced. The stories in the publication obviously remain valid, and any non-narrative material in them remains invalid.
